Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authorsManning, Clarence Augustus
History
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Ukrainian literature -- History and criticism
Almost universally also he refers to his people as Rusins or
Ruthenians. The name of Ukraine was taboo for political purposes in the
Austro-Hungarian Empire, and Franko would merely have been courting
trouble and injuring his own work, had he not followed the usual
practice. At times as in his poem _Ukraine_, he uses the word for the
larger entity. At the same time he worked steadily for the promotion
of closer relationships with the people in Great Ukraine. He did not
regard it possible that the two groups, the one in Austria-Hungary and
the other in Russia would be able to cooperate freely until the two
great Empires met with shipwreck and thus permitted the establishment
of a united and independent Ukraine. In both sections there were the
same economic problems of an oppressed agricultural race struggling
against a dominant aristocracy, largely composed of persons who had
risen out of their own soil and adopted a more aristocratic language
and mode of life. The danger of assimilation was however greater in
Russia than in Galicia where the process had largely slowed down some
centuries before, and so many of the themes which had stirred Levitsky
and others seem to pass unnoticed by Franko.
In the same way his literary models were those of Western Europe rather
than those of Russia. From his youth he was well educated in German and
he wrote for German as well as Polish papers. He was affected by the
types of writing common there, even more than by the developments in
Russia.
Despite all of the persecutions and the hardships that he had to meet,
he had still more abundant opportunities to express himself freely
on the political and social theories which he advocated than did
the authors who wrote in Russia, but he had to adapt himself to the
framework of the Hapsburg empire. Within that he struggled long and
strenuously for the welfare of his people. At times he was very popular
and his ideas caught public fancy. At times he stood alone and felt to
some degree that which Moses and his other lost leaders realized, that
he was ahead of his time, that he was not accomplishing all that he had
intended, that his words were not being interpreted in the sense in
which he meant them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account