United States Steel: A Corporation with a SoulCotter, Arundel
History
United States Steel: A Corporation with a Soul
Cotter, Arundel
United States Steel Corporation
How much of the export trade secured during the war years can be held
permanently is entirely a question of opinion. Undoubtedly, Great
Britain and Germany will strain every effort, when they get over their
present difficulties, to regain the business they lost to us between
1914 and 1918. They are already starting to compete. And France,
having recovered the vast ore deposits of Lorraine, may become a steel
exporter, too. On the other hand, some authorities are of the opinion
that manufacturing costs of steel in England and Germany at the time
this is written are higher than in the United States, and that the
European producer will never regain the advantage of low labor costs
he once enjoyed. Time alone will settle these questions. But with the
steel trade of the United States as a whole devoting its energies to
cultivating and holding foreign markets the probabilities are that at
least a substantial portion of the gain in exports shown in the war
period will be maintained indefinitely.
The Steel Products Company has not sought merely to increase the gross
tonnage of its business. In the years preceding the organization of
the Steel Corporation the steel exports of this country consisted very
largely of the cruder and less profitable materials, particularly iron
ore, pig iron, billets, and steel bars. It will readily be seen that
the most important business is that which shows the greatest profit,
that in finished rather than in raw or semi-finished material, the
finished product meaning not alone larger profits to the shipper,
but more employment and a higher rate of remuneration to labor. The
higher degree of finish to the products manufactured the greater the
wages paid to the worker. In exporting iron ore, pig iron, scrap and
cast iron, only the cheapest materials are involved, the lowest paid
labor engaged. It is a question whether such exports, particularly
those of iron ore and pig iron, are of any real benefit to the country
as they involve the sacrifice of natural resources usually at such
unremunerative prices that from the standpoint of conservation it might
appear wiser, to economists, to withhold these reserves for domestic
rather than foreign consumption. And the policy of the Corporation in
developing its world trade has been in harmony with this thought; its
efforts have been consistently to decrease the volume of its foreign
sales of the less-worked-up materials and to increase sales of the more
highly finished products.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account