Hugo, Victor, 1802-1885 -- Criticism and interpretation
At twenty-five the already celebrated lyric poet published his
magnificent historic drama of _Cromwell_: a work sufficient of itself to
establish the author's fame for all ages in which poetry and thought,
passion and humor, subtle truth of character, stately perfection of
structure, facile force of dialogue and splendid eloquence of style,
continue to be admired and enjoyed. That the author has apparently
confounded one earl of Rochester with another more famous bearer of the
same title must not be allowed to interfere with the credit due to him
for wide and various research. Any dullard can point the finger at a
slip here and there in the history, a change or an error of detail or of
date: it needs more care to appreciate the painstaking and ardent
industry which has collected and fused-together a great mass of historic
and legendary material, the fervent energy of inspiration which has
given life, order, and harmony to the vast and versatile design. As to
the executive part of the poem, the least that can be said by any
competent judge of that matter is that Molière was already equalled and
Corneille was already excelled in their respective provinces of verse by
the young conqueror whose rule was equal and imperial over every realm
of song. The comic interludes or episodes of the second and third acts,
so admirably welded into the structure or woven into the thread of the
action, would suffice to prove this when collated with the seventeenth
scene of the third act and the great speech of Cromwell in the fifth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account