English literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
"by keeping from practice; by resolutely following the law of its
own nature, which is to be a free play of the mind on all subjects
which it touches, by steadily refusing to lend itself to any of
those ulterior political, practical considerations about ideas
which plenty of people will be sure to attach to them, which
perhaps ought often to be attached to them, which in this country,
at any rate, are certain to be attached to them, but which
criticism has really nothing to do with. Its business is simply to
know the best that is known and thought in the world, and, by in
its turn making this known, to create a current of true and fresh
ideas. Its business is to do this with inflexible honesty, with due
ability; but its business is to do no more, and to leave alone all
questions of practical consequences and applications,--questions
which will never fail to have due prominence given to them."
We used just now a word of which Mr. Arnold is very fond,--a word of
which the general reader may require an explanation, but which, when
explained, he will be likely to find indispensable; we mean the word
_Philistine_. The term is of German origin, and has no English synonyme.
"At Soli," remarks Mr. Arnold, "I imagined they did not talk of
solecisms; and here, at the very head-quarters of Goliath, nobody talks
of Philistinism." The word _épicier_, used by Mr. Arnold as a French
synonyme, is not so good as _bourgeois_, and to those who know that
_bourgeois_ means a citizen, and who reflect that a citizen is a person
seriously interested in the maintenance of order, the German term may
now assume a more special significance. An English review briefly
defines it by saying that "it applies to the fat-headed respectable
public in general." This definition must satisfy us here. The Philistine
portion of the English press, by which we mean the considerably larger
portion, received Mr. Arnold's novel programme of criticism with the
uncompromising disapprobation which was to be expected from a literary
body, the principle of whose influence, or indeed of whose being is its
subservience, through its various members, to certain political and
religious interests.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account