Visits to Fields of Battle, in England, of the Fifteenth Century: to which are added, some miscellaneous tracts and papers upon archæological subjectsBrooke, Richard
History
Visits to Fields of Battle, in England, of the Fifteenth Century: to which are added, some miscellaneous tracts and papers upon archæological subjects
Brooke, Richard
Battlefields -- England; Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
{78a} Blackstone’s _Commentaries_, 3rd edition (by Stephen), vol. ii. p.
584.
{78b} Burn’s _Law Dictionary_, vol. ii. p. 108. The same observations
equally apply to the Lords Marchers on the boundaries between England and
Scotland.
{79a} Carte’s _England_, vol. iii. p. 135. There was also a seal of the
Marches, which was abrogated by the act 4th Henry VII., which enacted
that all grants and writings of lands or things pertaining to the earldom
of March, should be under the Broad Seal, and not under a special seal.
{79b} Statute 27th Henry VIII. c. 27. But, notwithstanding the
abolition of the local jurisdiction and of the almost lawless powers of
the Lords Marchers, by the effect of the act 27th Henry VIII. c. 27, the
Court of the Lord President and Council of the Marches of Wales, was
still kept up. It was a court of extensive jurisdiction, which was
erected by King Edward IV., in honour of the Earls of March, from whom he
was descended; and he appointed it to be held at Ludlow; and in the
thirty-third year of Henry VIII., the court was confirmed by act of
Parliament, which enacted, “that there shall be and remain a President
and Council, in the dominion of Wales, and marches of the same.” The
first President is said to have been Anthony Widevile, Earl Rivers, in
the 18th of Edward IV.; and the last was the Earl of Macclesfield, in
1689: the court having been abolished by act of Parliament of 1st William
and Mary.
{80a} Some parts of the inscription seem open to objection. From what
has been already mentioned in a former note, it may easily be conjectured
why the year is stated to be 1460, instead of 1461, as a modern
historical writer would have designated it; but it does not appear easy
to assign a reason, why the name “Mortimer” is inscribed instead of
“Plantagenet.”
{80b} The inscription is not altogether accurate, in stating that the
battle of Mortimer’s Cross fixed Edward IV. on the throne of England. He
certainly was proclaimed King by his partisans, in London, soon after
that battle, but he was indebted to the subsequent battle of Towton, for
his being really placed upon the throne. The statute 1st Edward IV.,
passed in 1461, declares the 4th of March to be the date when Edward IV.
commenced his reign; “the fourth day of the moneth of Marche last past
toke upon hym to use his right and title to the seid Reame of Englond and
Lordship and entred into the exercise of the Roiall estate, dignite,
preemynence and power of the same coroune, and to the Reigne and
governaunce of the seid Reame of Englond and Lordship; and the same
fourth day of March amoeved Henry late called King Henry the Sixt son to
Henry, son to the seid Henry late Erle of Derby, son to the seid John of
Gaunt, from the occupation, usurpation, intrusion, reigne, and
governaunce of the same Reame of Englond and Lordship.” _Rot. Parl._ 1
Edward IV. 1461, vol. v. fo. 464. See also Fabyan, fo. 218.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account