Voyage to the East IndiesPaulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
History
Voyage to the East Indies
Paulinus, a S. Bartholomaeo
India -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
I. Some consider the Ganges as the _Sarayuvà_, which Anquetil du
Perron calls _Sarjou_. Instead, therefore, of distinguishing two
large rivers, they mention only one, and give it the name of the
Ganges. This great error is observed in all the maps of India. Father
Tiefenthaler is the only author who has avoided it. De l’Isle, for
example, in his _Carte des Indes à Paris_ 1781, makes the Ganges and
another river take their source from one lake, and says: _Rivière qui
fort du même lac que le Gange; elle arrose le Royaume de Thibet_. He
then shews how the Ganges directs its course through India; but does
not speak a word of the _Sarayuvà_, which, however, is one of the
large rivers of that country.
II. Father Tiefenthaler and Anquetil du Perron were the first who
made a distinction between the Ganges and the _Sarayuvà_; who
assigned to each of these rivers a different source, and traced out
their proper courses. It is, however, here worthy of remark, that
the _Brahmaputra_ ridge of mountains, in which these two geographers
make the _Sarayuvà_ or _Sardjou_ take its rise, is called, in the
before-mentioned _Amaràsinha_, the mountain _Himala_. We thence find
that the Ganges is quite a different river from the _Sarayuvà_;
and we at the same time learn the real situation of the mountain
_Himala_, the _Imaus_ of the Greeks; for, according to Tiefenthaler’s
map, the _Sarayuvà_ has its source in the latitude of 35° north,
and the longitude of 78°; but according to M. De l’Isle’s map, in
the latitude of 34°, and the longitude of nearly 100°. We observe
farther, that the two appellations of the same river, which the old
Brahman catalogue in the _Amarasinha_ calls in the Samscred language
sometimes _Sarajuvà_, and sometimes _Shadrada_, have been changed
into _Sardjou_ and _Gagra_.
III. Tiefenthaler and Anquetil make, of the two streams _Sarayuvà_
and _Dèva_, only one, as may be seen in the before-mentioned map.
This is a very gross error; for, according to the book _Amarasinha_,
the _Dèva_ not only has a different name, but a totally different
origin. This river takes its source in the mountain _Sanhya_, and
in the Samscred language is called also _Vipasha_ and _Vipal_; both
which appellations belong to the _Dèva_ alone, and consequently
cannot be given to the _Sarayuvà_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account