Authors, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Critics -- Great Britain -- Biography; Pater, Walter, 1839-1894
The years that succeeded the first publication of the _Renaissance_
were not years of very strenuous literary work. Pater was at this
time holding the Tutorship of the College, as well as lecturing, and
the official business connected with the post was considerable. A
tutor is supposed to exert a general supervision over the work of
his pupils, to criticise their compositions and essays, and to keep
himself informed of their progress. It cannot be said that Pater’s
practical effectiveness was strong enough to equip him adequately for
the task. He received and criticised the essays; he responded with
cordial sympathy to any direct appeals for assistance; but a tutor,
to be effective, must have a power of shining, like the sun, upon the
eager and the reluctant, the grateful and the unthankful alike; some
pupils must be impulsively inspired; some delicately encouraged; some
ironically chastised; some few must, like the image of Democracy in
Tennyson’s poem, “toil onward, prick’d with goads and stings.”
Pater had little capacity for this kind of work—indeed, he did not
even conceive it to be his duty; but in any case the mere routine-work
was heavy. Moreover, he had to a certain extent come out of his shell,
enjoyed a good deal of quiet sociability, and gained a reputation as a
brilliant and paradoxical talker.
Meanwhile, as I have said, his literary output was small. His study of
“Wordsworth” (1874) is a very subtle piece of criticism. It is often
taken for granted that Wordsworth valued tranquillity above ardour,
and thus the essay is peculiarly felicitous in pointing out that not
mere contemplation, but _impassioned_ contemplation, was the underlying
purpose of the poet’s life. Pater shows that Wordsworth’s choice of
incidents and situations from common life was made “not for their
tameness, but for (their) passionate sincerity.” He indicates that the
reason why Wordsworth selected the homelier figures of the world for
his protagonists was that he might display “all the pathetic episodes
of their humble existence, their longing, their wonder at fortune,
their poor pathetic pleasures, like the pleasures of children, won so
hardly in the struggle for bare existence; their yearning towards each
other, in their darkened houses, or at their early toil.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account