This does not mean that she cannot make quite long voyages, since a
ship of the dimensions we are contemplating could store quite a lot
of air. But it does help to determine the strategy of space-warfare.
It will be fundamentally a struggle for bases where more oxygen can
be obtained. Not through going down into the atmosphere of Earth or
the thin atmosphere of Mars or the questionable one of Venus. It means
bases on the Moon and the asteroids.
The Moon and asteroids are made of rocks, on the surface at least, and
practically all rocks are loaded with oxygen--47% in the crust of
the Earth for example. With the kind of power that will be available
by time we get space-ships, it will be a comparatively simple matter
to separate these rock materials from their oxygen electrolytically.
Carbon dioxide is partly oxygen, of course, but so stubbornly bonded
that no ordinary electrolytic process will break it and it has the
unpleasant quality of being a gas under electrolytic conditions.
Since the oxygen-producing machinery will be too heavy and bulky
to carry aboard the space-ship the job will have to be done at
air-refueling stations and these advanced bases will be the key of
space-campaigns. Naturally, they will be powerfully fortified against
attack from the enemy's space-fleet. Equally naturally they will be
logical points of attack in the hope of limiting the enemy's operations
by cutting his bases from under him.
Thus the overall strategy of a space-campaign will somewhat resemble
that of the Pacific War, with each party trying to destroy or
neutralize the enemy's bases while extending his own. If both have
bases on the Moon or Mars there may even be ground campaigns in support
of those in the skies. And getting control of one of those erratic
asteroids that come within the orbit of Mars will count for ten.
What about armament? In stories of space-warfare that get away from
those improbable rays there is usually some kind of hyper-super-duper
torpedo, rocket-propelled. But this only demonstrates that the authors
of the stories are thinking in Earth-terms instead of space-terms.
It is perfectly plausible to include some torpedoes, probably with
atomic warheads, in the armament of a space-ship--something that would
knock out an enemy base or destroy a space-battleship at a single blow.
But the torpedo will always be what military men call a weapon of
opportunity.
They can't be used at all angles--it would be fatally easy for one of
them to make a near-miss on the enemy craft and atom-bomb your own Moon
base or some part of the Earth you didn't want atom-bombed. Earth's
gravitational attraction would pull such a torpedo in from quite a
distance out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account