English drama -- 17th century; English drama -- Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500-1600
Both playwrights indulge the late Elizabethan predilection for
conceits. Webster, here as elsewhere, proves himself the finer
artist. He inserts Vittoria's dream, Antonio's dialogue with Echo,
Bosola's Masque of Madmen, accidentally and subserviently to action.
Tourneur enlarges needlessly, but with lurid rhetorical effect,
upon the grisly humours suggested by the skull of Vendice's dead
mistress. Using similar materials, the one asserts his claim to be
called the nobler poet by more steady observance of the Greek precept
"Nothing overmuch." Words to the same effect might be written about
their several employment of blank verse and prose. Both follow
Shakespeare's distribution of these forms, while both run verse into
prose as Shakespeare never did. Yet I think we may detect a subtler
discriminative quality in Webster's most chaotic periods than we can in
Tourneur's; and what upon this point deserves notice is that Webster,
of the two, alone shows lyrical faculty. His three dirges are of
exquisite melodic rhythm, in a rich low minor key; much of his blank
verse has the ring of music; and even his prose suggests the colour of
song by its cadence. This cannot be said of the sinister and arid Muse
of Tourneur. She wears no evergreens of singing, nay, no yew-boughs
even, on her forehead. Her dusky eyes sparkle with sharp metallic
scintillations, as when Castiza says to her mother:--
Come from that poisonous woman there.
_The Revenger's Tragedy_ is an entangled web of lust, incest,
fratricide, rape, adultery, mutual suspicion, hate, and bloodshed,
through which runs, like a thread of glittering copper, the vengeance
of a cynical plague-fretted spirit. Vendice emerges from the tainted
crew of Duke and Duchess, Lussurioso, Spurio and Junior, Ambitioso and
Supervacuo, with a kind of blasted splendour. They are curling and
engendering, a brood of flat-headed asps, in the slime of their filthy
appetites and gross ambitions. He treads and tramples, on them all. But
he bears on his own forehead the brands of Lucifer, the rebel, and of
Cain, the assassin. The social corruption which transformed them into
reptiles, has made him a fiend incarnate. Penetrated to the core with
evil, conscious of sin far more than they are, he towers above them
by his satanic force of purpose. Though ruined, as they are ruined,
and by like causes, he maintains the dignity of mind and of volition.
The right is on his side; the right of a tyrannicide, who has seen his
own mistress, his own father, the wife of his friend, done to death by
the brutalities of wanton princelings. But Tourneur did not choose to
gift Vendice with elevation of nature. In the strongest scene of the
play he showed this scorpion of revenge, stooping to feign a pander's
part, tempting his mother and his sister as none but a moral leper
could have done. In the minor scene of the duke's murder, he made
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account