The opposite pole of love is pure benevolence. Men have sacrificed
their lives to helping lepers in such a case, the love they felt cannot
have had any element of aesthetic delight. Parental affection, as a
rule, is accompanied by pleasure in the child’s appearance, but remains
strong when this element is wholly absent. It would seem odd to call a
mother’s interest in a sick child “benevolence,” because we are in the
habit of using this word to describe a pale emotion nine parts humbug.
But it is difficult to find any other word to describe the desire for
another person’s welfare. It is a fact that a desire of this sort
may reach any degree of strength in the case of parental feeling. In
other cases it is far less intense; indeed it would seem likely that
all altruistic emotion is a sort of overflow of parental feeling,
or sometimes a sublimation of it. For want of a better word, I shall
call this emotion “benevolence.” But I want to make it clear that I am
speaking of an emotion, not a principle, and that I do not include in
it any feeling of superiority such as is sometimes associated with the
word. The word “sympathy” expresses part of what I mean, but leaves out
the element of activity that I wish to include.
Love at its fullest is an indissoluble combination of the two elements,
delight and well-wishing. The pleasure of a parent in a beautiful and
successful child combines both elements; so does sex-love at its best.
But in sex-love benevolence will only exist where there is secure
possession, since otherwise jealousy will destroy it, while perhaps
actually increasing the delight in contemplation. Delight without
well-wishing may be cruel; well-wishing without delight easily tends
to become cold and a little superior. A person who wishes to be loved
wishes to be the object of a love containing both elements, except in
cases of extreme weakness, such as infancy and severe illness. In these
cases benevolence may be all that is desired. Conversely, in cases of
extreme strength admiration is more desired than benevolence: this is
the state of mind of potentates and famous beauties. We only desire
other people’s good wishes in proportion as we feel ourselves in need
of help or in danger of harm from them. At least, that would seem to
be the biological logic of the situation, but it is not quite true
to life. We desire affection in order to escape from the feeling of
loneliness, in order to be, as we say, “understood.” This is a matter
of sympathy, not merely of benevolence; the person whose affection is
satisfactory to us must not merely wish us well, but must know in what
our happiness consists. But this belongs to the other element of the
good life, namely knowledge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account