EXPLANATION OF CONSCIOUSNESS.--MOTION A KIND OF ACTION.--WHAT
EFFECT IT HAS ON CONSCIOUSNESS--BRAIN AND CONSCIOUSNESS. WHICH
THE PRODUCT OF THE OTHER?--CONSCIOUSNESS IN VEGETABLE AND MINERAL
KINGDOMS LIMITED WHILE IN MAN ALMOST COMPLETE
That consciousness exists does not need proof; we know, and we know
that we know. We are conscious of consciousness; and now we have to
consider the source of consciousness. Turning back to the realities
we have considered, we find that time cannot be the source of
consciousness; we cannot think of time as being conscious, and the
same is true of space. We cannot conceive of consciousness as existing
in empty space, for there would be nothing there to be conscious; and
so we see that only substance can be conscious. Where there is no
substance there is nothing, and there can be no consciousness. This is
a proposition which you should consider well, until you have mastered
it in all its bearings; that there can be no consciousness apart from
substance; that empty space cannot be conscious. If consciousness
exists--and it does--there is a Conscious Substance.
This point we need to develop very fully, for it is vital. If it
is not substance which is conscious, then consciousness must exist
in the interstices between the particles of substance, or in empty
space; and it is empty space which is conscious, which is unthinkable.
But if consciousness exists in substance, then it is the substance
itself which is conscious; for there can be nothing in substance but
substance. It becomes clear, too, that consciousness cannot be the
result of functional action within an organism. Functional action is
merely motion, and motion is a shifting of substance from one place to
another. If consciousness were produced by motion, would it not still
be the substance which was conscious? Try to reason out how a substance
could be made conscious by shifting it from one place to another. If
consciousness was produced by the motion, then the substance could not
have been conscious before it moved, nor could it remain conscious
after it ceased to move. Try to think of a substance as becoming
conscious, and endowed with reason, memory and love while making a
certain motion, and as losing all these when ceasing to move; try to
reason out how motion could come first as a cause, and consciousness
follow as a result. Try to conceive of the Original Fluid Substance as
beginning, unconsciously, to move; and as producing, unconsciously,
all the orderly sequences of forms which appear in nature; and at
last, and only at last, becoming fully conscious of it all through the
unconscious beginning of a certain motion in the brain of man. Try to
think of full consciousness as having been lacking in the universe
until certain vibrations were started in the brain of man; you will
find all this unthinkable. Consciousness is not the result of motion,
but the first cause of motion. It is not motion which is conscious, but
substance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account