Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notesLoftie, W. J. (William John)
History
Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notes
Loftie, W. J. (William John)
Architecture -- England -- London; Whitehall (London, England) -- History
Sir William Chambers, the last of the Inigo Jones and Wren succession,
speaks especially of the circular court described above. There are few
nobler thoughts, he observes, in the remains of antiquity. The effect
of the building, properly carried out, would have been surprising and
great in the highest degree. The diameter of the court was to be 210
feet, the ground floor being an open arcade or cloister.
Jones wholly misapprehended the depth of the King’s purse when he made
a design of so costly a character. Otherwise, we must conclude that he
made these beautiful drawings for his own pleasure—a kind of vision
which he knew could never be realised. That this is not a correct
statement of the case seems to be proved by what followed. Let us take
the Banqueting House as a unit. It cost, roughly speaking, 20,000_l._,
of which sum 15,000_l._ was for the mere building. Three similar
buildings in the same court would have cost at least 60,000_l._, the
chapel more than the rest. This foots up at once to 80,000_l._ The
Persian Court could not have cost less than 50,000_l._ Add to this
the two magnificent halls, and we have 80,000_l._ more. Yet we have
only accounted for two of the seven courts, and have said nothing of
the four fronts. We feel tempted to think that Inigo, like the person
mentioned by Tennyson, built his soul “a lordly pleasure-house, wherein
at ease for aye to dwell,” and that he neither intended nor expected
that King James should carry it out. That this is not the case we can
judge by the design he made for Charles I. in 1639. It was to be of
only half the dimensions, and was to be studiously plain. Whereas the
Banqueting House was one of the plainest and least costly features of
the 1619 design, it would appear in the new view as one of the most
elaborately ornamented. But he misjudged the purse of the son, as
he had misjudged that of the father. Not a stone was ever laid, and
when, a few years later, the war broke out, it was hopeless to think
that Charles, though sorely in need of a commodious and really royal
residence, could ever build, even after the new and modified design
presented to him by his Surveyor.
[Illustration: _Part of the First Design by_ INIGO JONES
_for the Rebuilding of Whitehall_, 1619.
_From_ KENT’S “_Inigo Jones_.”]
[Illustration: _Part of the Second Design by_
INIGO JONES _for the Rebuilding of Whitehall_, 1639.
_From_ CAMPBELL’S “_Vitruvius Britannicus_.”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account