Why Bewick Succeeded: A Note in the History of Wood EngravingKainen, Jacob
History
Why Bewick Succeeded: A Note in the History of Wood Engraving
Kainen, Jacob
Bewick, Thomas, 1753-1828; Wood-engraving -- History
But the influence of copper plate work was strong, and some skillful but
misguided woodcut craftsmen tried to obtain some degree of its richness.
French artists from about 1720, notably Jean M. Papillon, produced cuts
so delicate that their printing became a problem (see fig. 6). Jackson,
who had worked with the French artist in Paris, condemned his efforts to
turn the woodcut into a tonal medium through the creation of numerous
delicate lines because such effects were impossible to print.
Jackson[14] is quoted in the _Enquiry_:
In 1728 Mr. _Pappillon_ began his small _Paris_ Almanack, wherein
is placed Cuts (done on Wood) allusive to each Month, with the
Signs of the Zodiack, in such a Minute Stile, that he seems to
forget in that Work the Impossibility of printing it in a Press
with any Clearness ... But alas! His father and M. _le Seur_ [also
woodcutters] had examined Impression and its Process, and saw how
careful the Ancients were to keep a proper Distance between their
Lines and hatched Works, so as to produce a clean Impression ... I
saw the Almanack in a horrid Condition before I left _Paris_, the
Signs of the Zodiack wore like a Blotch, notwithstanding the utmost
Care and Diligence the Printer used to take up very little Ink to
keep them clean.
It is clear that too thin a strip of white between black lines was not
suitable for printing in the first half of the 18th century. But when
Bewick's cuts after 1790 are examined we can see many white lines
thinner than a hair. Obviously something had happened to permit him a
flexibility not granted to earlier workers on wood. Bewick's whole craft
depended upon his ability to control white lines of varying thickness.
Why was he able to do this, and why could it be done without trouble by
others after him?
Early paper, as already mentioned, had a ribbed grain because it was
made on a hand mould in which wires were closely laid in one direction,
but with enough space between to allow the water in the paper pulp to
drain through. Crossing wires, set some distance apart, held them
together. Each wire, however, made a slight impression in the finished
paper, the result being a surface with minute ripples. The surface of
this laid paper presented irregularities even after the glazing
operation, done with hammers before about 1720 and with wooden rollers
up to about 1825.[15]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account