It was well for them, therefore, that their creed, like their code of
manners and morals, was identical or practically identical. It was a
simple creed and they held to it loyally and faithfully. They believed
in a large, vague and beautifully undefined identity, called by William
the People, and by Griselda, Woman; who in the time to come was to
accomplish much beautiful and undefined Good; and in whose service they
were prepared meanwhile to suffer any amount of obloquy and talk any
amount of nonsense. They believed that Society could be straightened
and set right by the well-meaning efforts of well-meaning souls like
themselves—aided by the Ballot, the Voice of the People, and Woman.
They believed, in defiance of the teachings of history, that Democracy
is another word for peace and goodwill towards men. They believed
(quite rightly) in the purity of their own intentions; and concluded
(quite wrongly) that the intentions of all persons who did not agree
with them must therefore be evil and impure.... They were, in short,
very honest and devout sectarians—cocksure, contemptuous, intolerant,
self-sacrificing after the manner of their kind.
They held, as I have said, to their own opinions strongly and would have
died rather than renounce, or seem to renounce, them—which did not
restrain them from resenting the same attitude of mind and heart in
others. What in themselves they admired as loyalty, they denounced in
others as interested and malignant stubbornness. More—it did not
prevent them from disliking and despising many excellent persons whose
opinions, if analysed, would have proved nearly akin to their own.
William, for instance, would all but foam at the mouth when compulsory
service in the army was the subject of conversation, and "militarism,"
to him, was the blackest of all the works of the devil; but he was
bitter, and violently bitter, against the blackleg who objected to
compulsory service in a Trade Union, and had spoken, times without
number, in hearty encouragement of that form of siege warfare which is
commonly known as a Strike. He was a pacifist of the type which seeks
peace and ensues it by insisting firmly, and even to blood, that it is
the other side’s duty to give way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account