Griselda also was a pacifist—when it suited her and when she had got her
way. She believed in a future World-Amity, brought about chiefly by
Woman; meanwhile, she exulted loudly and frequently in the fighting
qualities of her sex. Like William, she had no quarrel with Continental
nations; on the contrary, what she had seen of Continental nations
during a fortnight’s stay at Interlaken had inclined her to look on them
with favour. Like William, her combatant instincts were concentrated on
antagonists nearer home; she knew them better and therefore disliked
them more. It is a mistake to suppose that either nations or individuals
will necessarily like the people they see most of; if you must know a
man in order to love him, you seldom hate a man with whom you have not
acquaintance. Nothing could have been more ideally peaceful than the
relations of China and England during the Middle Ages—for the simple
reason that China and England knew absolutely nothing of each other. In
the same way, if in a lesser degree, Griselda and William had a friendly
feeling for Germany and the German people. They had never been to
Germany and knew nothing of her history or politics; but they had heard
of the Germans as intelligent people addicted to spectacles, beer and
sonatas, and established on the banks of the Rhine. And—the Rhine being
some way off—they liked them.
As internationalists they had no words too strong for standing armies
and their methods; but upon military operations against domestic tyrants
they looked with less disapproval. There existed, I believe, in the
back of their minds some ill-defined distinction between bloodshed
perpetrated by persons clad in uniform and by persons not so
clad—between fighting with bayonets and fighting with bombs and
brickbats. The one was militarism and unjustifiable; the other heroism
and holy. Had you been unkind enough to pen them into a corner and
force them to acknowledge that there are many born warriors out of
khaki, they would have ended probably by declaring that one should take
arms only against tyranny and in a righteous cause—and so have found
themselves in entire agreement not only with their adversary but with
the Tory Party, the German Emperor, the professional soldier and poor
humanity in general. The elect, when one comes to examine them, are not
always so very elect. The difficulty would have been to persuade them
that there could be two opinions concerning a cause they espoused; their
little vision was as narrow as it was pure, and their little minds were
so seldom exhausted by thinking. Apostles of the reign of Woman and of
International Amity, they might have been summed up as the perfect type
of aggressor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account