about the matter, that it was this discovery of the valves of the veins
which led Harvey to imagine the course of the circulation of the blood.
Now it did not lead Harvey to imagine anything of the kind. He had heard
all about it from his master, Fabricius, who made a great point of these
valves in the veins, and he had heard the theories which Fabricius
entertained upon the subject, whose impression as to the use of the valves
was simply this—that they tended to take off any excess of pressure
of the blood in passing from the heart to the extremities; for Fabricius
believed, with the rest of the world, that the blood in the veins flowed
from the heart towards the extremities. This, under the circumstances, was
as good a theory as any other, because the action of the valves depends
altogether upon the form and nature of the walls of the structures in
which they are attached; and without accurate experiment, it was
impossible to say whether the theory of Fabricius was right or wrong. But
we not only have the evidence of the facts themselves that these could
tell Harvey nothing about the circulation, but we have his own distinct
declaration as to the considerations which led him to the true theory of
the circulation of the blood, and amongst these the valves of the veins
are not mentioned.
Fig. 4.—The circulation of the blood as demonstrated by Harvey (A.D.
1628).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account