Now then we may come to Harvey himself. When you read Harvey's treatise,
which is one of the most remarkable scientific monographs with which I am
acquainted—it occupies between 50 and 60 pages of a small quarto in
Latin, and is as terse and concise as it possibly can be—when you
come to look at Harvey's work, you will find that he had long struggled
with the difficulties of the accepted doctrine of the circulation. He had
received from Fabricius, and from all the great authorities of the day,
the current view of the circulation of the blood. But he was a man with
that rarest of all qualities—intellectual honesty; and by dint of
cultivating that great faculty, which is more moral than intellectual, it
had become impossible for him to say he believed anything which he did not
clearly believe. This is a most uncomfortable peculiarity—for it
gets you into all sorts of difficulties with all sorts of people—but,
for scientific purposes, it is absolutely invaluable. Harvey possessed
this peculiarity in the highest degree, and so it was impossible for him
to accept what all the authorities told him, and he looked into the matter
for himself. But he was not hasty. He worked at his new views, and he
lectured about them at the College of Physicians for nine years; he did
not print them until he was a man of fifty years of age; and when he did
print them he accompanied them with a demonstration which has never been
shaken, and which will stand till the end of time. What Harvey proved, in
short, was this (see Fig. 4)—that everybody had made a mistake, for
want of sufficiently accurate experimentation as to the actual existence
of the fact which everybody assumed. To anybody who looks at the
blood-vessels with an unprejudiced eye it seems so natural that the blood
should all come out of the liver, and be distributed by the veins to the
different parts of the body, that nothing can seem simpler or more plain;
and consequently no one could make up his mind to dispute this apparently
obvious assumption. But Harvey did dispute it; and when he came to
investigate the matter he discovered that it was a profound mistake, and
that, all this time, the blood had been moving in just the opposite
direction, namely, from the small ramifications of the veins towards the
right side of the heart. Harvey further found that, in the arteries, the
blood, as had previously been known, was travelling from the greater
trunks towards the ramifications. Moreover, referring to the ideas of
Columbus and of Galen (for he was a great student of literature, and did
justice to all his predecessors), Harvey accepts and strengthens their
view of the course of the blood through the lungs, and he shows how it
fitted into his general scheme.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account