William Shakespeare: A Critical StudyBrandes, Georg
General
William Shakespeare: A Critical Study
Brandes, Georg
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Criticism and interpretation
No doubt Shakespeare's imagination here started from a basis of
personal experience. As a young player and poet, he in all probability
lived a Bohemian life in London, not, indeed, of debauchery, but full
of such passions and dissipations as his vigorous temperament, his
overflowing vitality, and his position beyond the pale of staid and
respectable citizenship, would tend to throw in his way. The Sonnets,
which speak so plainly of vehement and fateful emotions on his part,
also hint at temptations which he did not resist. We read, for
instance, in Sonnet cxix.:--
"What potions have I drunk of Siren tears,
Distill'd from limbecks foul as hell within,
Applying fears to hopes, and hopes to fears,
Still losing when I saw myself to win!
What wretched errors hath my heart committed,
Whilst it hath thought itself so blessed never!
How have mine eyes out of their spheres been fitted,
In the distraction of this madding fever!"
And again in Sonnet cxxix.:--
"The expense of spirit in a waste of shame
Is lust in action; and till action, lust
Is perjur'd, murderous, bloody, full of blame,
Savage, extreme, rude, cruel, not to trust;
Enjoy'd no sooner but despised straight;
Past reason hunted; and no sooner had,
Past reason hated, as a swallow'd bait,
On purpose laid to make the taker mad:
. . . . . . . .
All this the world well knows; yet none knows well
To shun the heaven that leads men to this hell."
This is the philosophy of the morrow, of the reaction. But Shakespeare
had also, no doubt, his hours of light-hearted enjoyment, when such
moralising reflections were far enough from his mind. We have evidence
of this in more than one anecdote. In the diary of John Manningham, of
the Middle Temple, the following entry occurs, under the date March 13,
1602:--
"Upon a tyme when Burbidge played Rich. 3, there was a
Citizen grone soe farr in liking with him, that before shee
went from the play shee appointed him to come that night
vnto hir by the name of Ri: the 3. Shakespeare ouerhearing
their conclusion went before, [and] was intertained .. ere
Burbidge came. Then message being brought that Rich, the 3d
was at the dore, Shakespeare caused returne to be made that
William the Conquerour was before Rich. the 3. Shakespere's
name was William."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account