Wit and its relation to the unconsciousFreud, Sigmund
Science
Wit and its relation to the unconscious
Freud, Sigmund
Subconsciousness; Wit and humor -- Psychological aspects
I can mention a few examples of identical technique. A witticism of this
sort was utilized by an Italian lady to avenge a tactless remark made to
her by the first Napoleon. Pointing to her compatriots at a court ball
he said: “_Tutti gli Italian danzano si male_” (all Italians dance so
badly). To which she quickly replied: _“Non tutti, ma buona parte”_ (Not
all, but a great many)—
Buona parte.[22]
————————————
Buonaparte.
Brill reports still another example in which the wit depends on the
twofold application of a name: “_Hood once remarked that he had to be a
lively Hood for a livelihood._”[23]
At one time when Antigone was produced in Berlin a critic found that the
presentation entirely lacked the character of antiquity. The wits of
Berlin incorporated this criticism in the following manner: “_Antique?
Oh, nay_” (Th. Vischer and K. Fischer).
_Manifold Application of the Same Material_
In these examples, which will suffice for this species of wit, the
technique is the same. A name is made use of twice; first, as a whole,
and then divided into its syllables—and in their divided state the
syllables yield a different meaning.[24] The manifold application of the
same word, once as a whole and then as the component syllables into
which it divides itself, was the first case that came to our attention
in which technique deviated from that of condensation. Upon brief
reflection, however, we must divine from the abundance of examples that
come to us that the newly discovered technique can hardly be limited to
this single means. Obviously there are any number of hitherto unobserved
possibilities for one to utilize the same word or the same material of
words in manifold application _in one sentence_. May not all these
possibilities furnish technical means for wit? It would seem so, judging
by the following examples.
“_Two witty statesmen, X and Y, met at a dinner. X, acting as
toastmaster, introduced Y as follows: ‘My friend, Y, is a very wonderful
man. All you have to do is to open his mouth, put in a dinner, and a
speech appears, etc.’ Responding to the speaker, Y said: ‘My friend, the
toastmaster, told you what a wonderful man I am, that all you have to do
is to open my mouth, put in a dinner, and a speech appears. Now let me
tell you what a wonderful man he is. All you have to do is open
anybody’s mouth, put in his speech, and the dinner appears.’_”[25]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account