Aeronautics, Military -- France; World War, 1914-1918 -- Aerial operations; World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives
The democracy existing in the French army since the outbreak of
hostilities has aroused the enthusiasm of every observer and has caused
much surprise to incredulous pacifists. The Aviation Corps I found even
more democratic among themselves than the other branches of the service.
I suppose one of the reasons for this total absence of distinction
between officers and men is because they all have passed through the
same schools, through the same courses of training, and have run the
same risks. Among the pilots, however, one may notice three classes.
The first and predominating class is that composed of "gentlemen." By
gentlemen I mean gentlemen in the English sense—men who in private life
have the leisure time to be sportsmen, and who in war have chosen
aviation because it is a more sporting proposition than fighting in the
trenches. The second class comprises those who before the war were
professional pilots or aviation mechanics. In the third class one finds
men who were mechanics or chauffeurs by trade and who were accepted
because their knowledge of machinery would ultimately help them to
become pilots.
The best pilots are obtained from men between the ages of twenty and
thirty. Under twenty a boy is too impetuous, and over thirty a man is
apt to be too cautious. Of course, there are exceptions, but these
limits express the preferences of the instructors at the schools.
At the "R.G.A." there is also a course for the training of young
artillery officers who have volunteered as observers for the aviation.
Our duty as pilots was to take one of these officers up with us every
time we made a flight, so as to give him "air sense." We would make
imaginary reconnoissances all over the country, regulate supposed
batteries, and go on photographic missions. The observer would send off
his reports by wireless and direct us by his maps, while we would do our
best to throw him off his guard and make him lose his bearings. In this
way observer and pilot work together and help each other with
observations and advice. During my stay at the "R.G.A." my partner was
a young artillery officer who had just been promoted from the ranks. He
was very clever and full of enthusiasm for his work, and we derived much
pleasure from our association.
"Réglage," or fire-control, was a course that involved practice,
constant practice, and still more practice, in developing a faculty for
reading distances. We would go up and try to estimate just where the
puffs of smoke, representing the explosion of shells, went off. The
corrections then had to be wirelessed to the battery, so that the next
shots might get "home." In real observation work the observer does all
this. The pilot merely flies the machine. It is thought best, however,
for the pilot to have the same training and technic as the observer, so
that he may help the latter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account