English poetry -- 19th century; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions; Women -- Suffrage
“Nevertheless, in non-corporate districts, women continued to vote as
freely as before, and thus secured the ultimate restitution of the
rights of their disfranchised sisters in incorporated districts; for,
when in 1869, on the consideration of the Municipal Franchise Bill of
that year, these peculiar facts were brought to the notice of the
House of Commons, and it was shown that the incorporation of any
district involved the summary disfranchisement of the women
ratepayers, the House, without a dissentient word, or any shadow of
opposition, adopted the proposal to omit the word ‘male’ before the
word ‘person’ in Section 1 of the Bill, and thus restored the rights
of the women ratepayers, of whom many thousands voted, as a
consequence of the passing of the Act, in the municipal elections of
the following November.”—Mrs. Harriett McIlquham (“The Enfranchisement
of Women: An Ancient Right, a Modern Need,” pp. 5, 12, 13.)
8.—“... _infants, felons, fools_ ...”
This legal courteousness has afforded Miss Frances Power Cobbe the text
for an instructive paper: “Criminals, Idiots, Women, and Minors: Is the
Classification Sound?” (_Fraser’s Magazine_, December, 1868.)
A recent instance of the official collocation is to be found in the Act
5 and 6 Vict., Cap. 35, Sec. 41:—
“And be it enacted, that the trustee, guardian, tutor, curator, or
committee of any person, being an infant, or married woman, lunatic,
idiot, or insane, and having the direction, control, or management of
the property or concern of such infant, married woman, lunatic, idiot,
or insane person, whether such infant, married woman, lunatic, idiot, or
insane person shall reside in the United Kingdom or not,” etc., etc.
XXXVIII.
7.—“... _every bond erased_ ...”
“In the struggle of the races, keeping in view the teachings of
evolutionists, the most reasonable and sensible thing, in addition to
its _justness_, appears to be this:
“First, to place women on an equal footing with men, socially, and _in
the eyes of the law_. Before _that_ is done, it is useless to talk about
women’s superiority or equality. It is all breath and words, or paper
and ink. In the eyes of the law she is man’s inferior. That is not all.
In the eyes of the law the most cultured woman is inferior to the most
uncultured man; she is, in fact, pretty much on a level with a baby, or
a boy or girl under age. Moreover, the most cultured woman in the United
Kingdom is considered inferior, politically, to the American negro!
“Second, let the two sexes settle matters among themselves, as far as
intellect is concerned, as men now settle matters among themselves,
without imposing on each other any disability. Those of both sexes who
are weak will soon find their intellectual level; and those of both
sexes who are strong will soon come to the front.”—Emanuel Bonavia, M.D.
(“Woman’s Frontal Lobes”).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account