Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
It was soon found that girls fresh from the grammar schools were not fit
candidates for normal training. To remedy this difficulty a few
additional branches of study were introduced, a slight alteration made
in the arrangement of the course, and the name changed to the Girls’
High and Normal School. Under this name it continued until 1872, when it
was found that the normal element had been absorbed by the high school,
and had almost lost its independent, distinctive, and professional
character. The two courses were then separated and the normal department
was restored to its original condition, for the instruction of young
women who intended to become teachers in Boston.
Boston had now, at length, a school for girls, devoted, like that for
boys, to general culture, though still without opportunity for full
classical training, such as had been freely offered Boston boys for
almost two and a half centuries. But to taste intellectually, as well as
physically, is to stimulate appetite.
In 1877 a society of 200 thoughtful and influential women, incorporated
as the “Massachusetts Society for the University Education of Women,”
supported by men of equal dignity, and prominently associated with
educational and kindred movements, petitioned the school committee “that
a course of classical instruction may be offered to girls in the Boston
Latin School, as is now offered to boys.”
This petition was reinforced by a similar one from the “Woman’s
Educational Association,” which, later, instigated and supported the
Harvard examination for women. The trustees of “Boston University”
officially memorialized the school board in the same interest.
The claim was urged by distinguished divines, physicians, educators,
presidents of colleges, a founder of a college, statesmen, and by
mothers of girls. They argued a public advantage, a public demand, and a
public right. They showed that almost every prominent city and town in
the State gave to girls in its public high school,—which was usually
co-educational,—a chance to fit for college; while the towns that had
been annexed to Boston,—Charlestown, Dorchester, Brighton, and West
Roxbury, had thereby lost such advantage, which their girls had
previously enjoyed. The presidents of co-educational and female colleges
testified that while no Boston high school girl was prepared to enter
their institutions, they were receiving well-prepared young women from
the more liberal West.
The ladies petitioning, called attention to the fact that the colonial
law of 1647 required every township of 100 families “to provide for the
instruction of youth so far as to fit them for the University,” and that
in Massachusetts, from that time, there never has been a law passed
concerning any public school which has authorized instruction to one sex
not equally open to the other; that nowhere does the word “male” or
“boy” occur, but always “children” or “youth.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account