Woman—through a man's eyeglassSalaman, Malcolm C. (Malcolm Charles)
General
Woman—through a man's eyeglass
Salaman, Malcolm C. (Malcolm Charles)
Single women; Wives -- Anecdotes; Women -- Anecdotes; Women -- Social and moral questions
He was not an ordinary lover, he was not an ordinary man. He was a
visionary, a poet, a dreamer, with a genius for planning great works
and achieving none. He was full of ideas, vague, beautiful ideas which
remained abstract, but never took concrete form. He would conceive
lovely lyrics, imagine glorious epics, dream splendid dramas—and
write a few columns for the newspapers. He was always going to do
something, but time went by, and he did nothing, that is, nothing
worthy of his undoubted abilities. He started life with brilliant
promise, and probably had he known Miss Strongith’will in the days of
his promise, he might have given the world something to remember, but
he was naturally indolent and terribly sensitive, he hated the actual
labour of writing, and the process of materialising his imagination,
of reducing his ideas to words, destroyed their charm for him. He would
revel in a fancy, but he could never satisfy himself in giving it form
and expression, and he would not expose to unsympathetic criticism his
dreams and fancies in forms which did not fully realise them. Thus he
was frittering away his time, his opportunities, and such talents as
were his when he met Miss Strongith’will.
He had just written enough in his time to reveal latent possibilities
of literary achievement, and his poetic temperament appealed to her
imagination. It touched her sentimentally as she had never been touched
before, at the same time that it stirred her intellectually. She felt
that here was a man with talent, but without the requisite impulse
of industry; what if she should make him achieve something noble and
endurable? Like Keats, he declared himself for a life of sensations
rather than of thoughts. She would try and help him to combine both
sensation and thought, with the result that he should produce poems
worthy to live. His intellectual inertness should be corrected by her
strength of mind. He should yet be great through her sympathy, her
aid, her love. For she loved him; his very frailty of temperament,
his acute sensitiveness, his lack of self-reliance, all appealed to
her strong nature, and she gave him that love which is all the deeper
because it feels bound to protect its object. But his imagination was
not satisfied by love of this order, it was not sufficiently romantic,
his temperament needed passionate response rather than intellectual
aid. She loved him entirely in her womanly way, and according to the
utmost possibilities of her nature, in which, however the intellectual
element dominated the emotional, whereas in her lover’s nature it
was the reverse. So, while he grew impatient and weary, she began to
realise a sense of disappointment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account