This means that women must carry their womanhood with them into all
occupations, otherwise the advantage of their entry into public affairs
will be entirely lost. Besides, a woman who tries to do a man’s work
in a man’s way pays too high a price for the effort. A man can be
formal and abstract without losing his human qualities or ceasing to be
creative, since his energies are distributed in that way, but a woman
cannot. She must expend more energy than he does to achieve the same
formal outlook; she must abandon the creative love for the individual
which is essential for womanhood; and, because she has killed herself
spiritually, a formal woman is twice as formal as any man, and her
work is necessarily barren. Most women are instinctively aware of this
danger and protect themselves from the hardening of traditional routine
by simple indifference to their work and an escape into marriage
as soon as possible. But this is merely an evasion of the problem
which women must solve in the next generation or two, the problem
of leavening the organised systems of society with human values so
that mechanical routine is reduced to a minimum. Meanwhile, women are
obviously in their proper place in any occupation which deals directly
with human beings.
IX
The differences that have been indicated between the sexes in
this essay do not form a hard-and-fast dividing line. Men are not
all intellect and consciousness, nor are women all intuition and
unconsciousness. It would be juster to say that some men are more
intellectual than any woman, and some women more intuitive than any
man: but even this statement does not adequately cover the case. The
different determination of energy which hinders women from supreme
intellectual detachment, and men from supreme human understanding, is
subtly operative between these two extremes throughout the intervening
space where men and women have a common field of action. It should
therefore be traceable in their respective contributions to art.
It is perhaps unwise though interesting to attempt the drawing of
distinctions between men’s art and women’s: so much depends upon one’s
idea of the nature of art. But it may be possible without becoming
entangled in controversy to suggest tentatively some differences, and
it seems worth while to see how far the argument will carry us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account