Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
_Medicine._—Though we find many references to women who practised
medicine and surgery as professions, in the majority of cases their
skill was used only for the assistance of their family and neighbours.
_Midwifery._—Midwifery was upon a different footing, standing out as the
most important public function exercised by women, and being regarded as
their inviolable mystery till near the beginning of the seventeenth
century. The steady process through which in this profession women were
then supplanted by men, furnishes an example of the way in which women
have lost their hold upon all branches of skilled responsible work,
through being deprived of opportunities for specialised training.
The relative deterioration of woman’s capacity in comparison with the
standard of men’s efficiency cannot be more clearly shown than in the
history of midwifery. Even though the actual skill of midwives may not
have declined during the seventeenth century men were rapidly surpassing
them in scientific knowledge, for the general standard of women’s
education was declining, and they were debarred from access to the
higher branches of learning. As the absence of technical training kept
women out of the skilled trades, so did the lack of scientific education
drive them from the more profitable practice of midwifery, which in
former times tradition and prejudice had reserved as their monopoly.
A. _Nursing._
Whatever arrangements had been made by the religious orders in England
for the care of the sick poor were swept away by the Reformation. The
provision which existed in the seventeenth century for this purpose
rested on a lay basis, quite unconnected with the Church. Amongst the
most famous charitable institutions were the four London Hospitals;
Christ’s Hospital for children under the age of sixteen, St.
Bartholomew’s and St. Thomas’s for the sick and impotent poor, and
Bethlehem for the insane.
There is no evidence that the women of the upper classes took any part
in the management of these hospitals. The squalor and the ugly and
disgusting details which are associated with nursing the diseased and
often degraded poor, was unredeemed by the radiance with which a mystic
realisation of the Divine Presence had upheld the Catholic Saints, or by
the passionate desire for the service of humanity which inspired
Florence Nightingale. Thus it was only the necessity for earning their
daily bread which induced any women to enter the profession of nursing
during this period, and as the salaries offered were considerably lower
than the wages earned by a competent servant in London, it may be
supposed that the class attracted did not represent the most efficient
type of women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account