Ye Olde Mint: Being a brief description of the first U.S. Mint, established by Congress in the year 1792, at Seventh Street and Sugar Alley (now Filbert Street) PhiladelphiaStewart, Frank H.
History
Ye Olde Mint: Being a brief description of the first U.S. Mint, established by Congress in the year 1792, at Seventh Street and Sugar Alley (now Filbert Street) Philadelphia
Stewart, Frank H.
37-39 North Seventh Street (Philadelphia, Pa.); Historic buildings -- Pennsylvania -- Philadelphia; Mints -- United States -- History; Old United States Mint (Philadelphia, Pa.); Philadelphia (Pa.) -- Buildings, structures, etc.
These two men were required to furnish security in the sum of ten
thousand dollars each, which neither was able to do, and Jefferson stated
that the coinage of precious metals was prevented for some time past, but
that in order that the mint might not be entirely idle the coinage of
copper had been going on. Jefferson recommended that their securities be
lessened by reducing their responsibilities.
[Illustration: BASEMENT OF COINAGE BUILDING
SHOWING PRESS SUPPORTS AND HAMMERED ONE INCH SQUARE IRON WINDOW BARS.
TIMBERS AVERAGE 12 INCHES SQUARE. CUT SHOWS NEARLY ONE HALF OF BASEMENT.]
October 28, 1794, David Rittenhouse, director of the mint, reported that
it had been necessary to purchase an additional lot of ground, that
nearly one million of cents had been coined and a beginning made in the
coinage of precious metals, that nearly 120,000 ounces of bullion had
been deposited for coinage and that a large parcel of blank dollars was
ready for coining as soon as a more powerful press could be finished.
February 9, 1795, Mr. Boudinot, one of the Congressional Committee
appointed to examine and report on the state of the mint, made a long
report on the duties and work of the various employees.
At that time besides the buildings at 37 and 39 North Seventh Street,
now belonging to the Frank H. Stewart Electric Company, a lease was held
on one in the “Northern Liberties” for five years at the rent of five
shillings per annum, a very trifling sum indeed.
There was more or less criticism about the conduct of the mint which
Mr. Boudinot explained was due to trouble in getting competent workmen,
proper materials and strong apparatus. He reported the lots for the
buildings were too small and that this hindered the operations; and,
further, that the frequent breaking of dies, which were all made in
the mint, caused numerous delays. Up to September, 1794, the lands
purchased had cost $4,266.66; buildings, apparatus, machines, etc.,
$22,720.45; copper, $15,815.51; salaries, $15,591.99, a grand total of
$58,394.61, which he considered a very great amount. He remarked that a
great saving could be made if the machinery could be operated by water
or steam instead of manual labor or that of horses. He noted that in
case the projected canal between the Schuylkill and Delaware should be
accomplished the heavy expense of the mint would be greatly reduced.
His report, among other things, showed that when the bullion was not
in use it was kept under two locks, the keys of which were kept by the
assayer and chief coiner. This was for the time it was in the custody
of the chief coiner. That part not in his custody was in the vaults of
the mint, also secured under two locks, keys of which were kept by the
treasurer and assayer. Mention is made elsewhere regarding these vaults.
He recommended a reduction in the size of the copper cent and a change in
the standard for silver coins to ten parts silver and one part copper.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account