Yoga as philosophy and religionDasgupta, Surendranath
Religion
Yoga as philosophy and religion
Dasgupta, Surendranath
Hindu philosophy; Patañjali; Yoga
Ahiṃsā is a great universal duty which a man should impose on himself in
all conditions of life, everywhere, and at all times without restricting
or qualifying it with any limitation whatsoever. In _Mahābhārata
Mokshadharmādhyāya_ it is said that the Sāṃkhya lays stress upon
non-injury, whereas the Yoga lays stress upon samādhi; but here we see
that Yoga also holds that ahiṃsā should be the greatest ethical motive
for all our conduct. It is by ahiṃsā alone that we can make ourselves
fit for the higher type of samādhi. All other virtues of truthfulness,
non-stealing only serve to make non-injury more and more perfect. It is
not, however, easy to say whether the Sāṃkhyists attached so much
importance to non-injury that they believed it to lead to samādhi
directly without the intermediate stages of samādhi. We see, however,
that the Yoga also attaches great importance to it and holds that a man
should refrain from all external acts; for however good they may be they
cannot be such as not to lead to some kind of injury or hiṃsā towards
beings, for external actions can never be performed without doing some
harm to others. We have seen that from this point of view Yoga holds
that the only pure works (śuklakarma) are those mental works of good
thoughts in which perfection of ahiṃsā is attained. With the growth of
good works (śuklakarma) and the perfect realisation of non-injury the
mind naturally passes into the state in which its actions are neither
good (śukla) nor bad (aśukla); and this state is immediately followed by
that of kaivalya.
Veracity consists in word and thought being in accordance with facts.
Speech and mind correspond to what has been seen, heard and inferred.
Speech is for the purpose of transferring knowledge to another. It is
always to be employed for the good of others and not for their injury;
for it should not be defective as in the case of Yudhishṭhira, where his
motive was bad.[42] If it prove to be injurious to living beings, even
though uttered as truth, it is not truth; it is sin only. Though
outwardly such a truthful course may be considered virtuous, yet since
by his truth he has caused injury to another person, he has in reality
violated the true standard of non-injury (_ahiṃsā_). Therefore let
everyone first examine well and then utter truth for the benefit of all
living beings. All truths should be tested by the canon of non-injury
(_ahiṃsā_).
Asteya is the virtue of abstaining from stealing. Theft is making one’s
own unlawfully things that belong to others. Abstinence from theft
consists in the absence of the desire thereof.
Brahmacaryya (continence) is the restraint of the generative organ and
the thorough control of sexual tendencies.
Aparigraha is want of avariciousness, the non-appropriation of things
not one’s own; this is attained on seeing the defects of attachment and
of the injury caused by the obtaining, preservation and destruction of
objects of sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account