A Moslem seeker after God : $b showing Islam at its best in the life and teaching of al-Ghazali, mystic and theologian of the eleventh century — Al-Ghazali — John Shaqi
A Moslem seeker after God : $b showing Islam at its best in the life and teaching of al-Ghazali, mystic and theologian of the eleventh century
Al-Ghazali · en
He probably began to read even before the age of seven, for we find
that his studies at Tus, and afterwards at Jurjan, apparently included
not only religious science but also a thorough knowledge of Persian
and Arabic. Of his religious studies we will speak later. He himself
tells us that the philosophical sciences taught included “mathematics,
logic, physics, metaphysics, politics, and moral philosophy.” And
although he does not speak in his Confessions of his earliest studies,
what he says in regard to mathematics throws a flood of light on his
youthful scepticism. He says, “Mathematics comprises the knowledge of
calculation, geometry, and cosmography: it has no connection with the
religious sciences, and proves nothing for or against religion; it rests
on a foundation of proofs which, once known and understood, cannot be
refuted. Mathematics tend, however, to produce two bad results. The first
is this: Whoever studies this science admires the subtlety and clearness
of its proofs. His confidence in philosophy increases, and he thinks that
all its departments are capable of the same clearness and solidity of
proofs as mathematics. But when he hears people speak of the unbelief and
impiety of mathematicians, of their professed disregard for the divine
Law, which is notorious, it is true that, out of regard for authority, he
echoes these accusations, but he says to himself at the same time that,
if there was truth in religion, it would not have escaped those who have
displayed so much keenness of intellect in the study of mathematics.”
Next, when he becomes aware of the unbelief and rejection of religion
on the part of these learned men, he concludes that to reject religion
is reasonable. “How many of such men gone astray I have met, whose sole
argument was that just mentioned!” (p. 28).