English Illustration 'The Sixties': 1855-70: With Numerous Illustrations by Ford Madox Brown: A. Boyd Houghton: Arthur Hughes: Charles Keene: M. J. Lawless: Lord Leighton, P.R.A.: Sir J. E. Millais, P.R.A.: G. Du Maurier: J. W. North, R.A.: G. J. Pinwell: Dante Gabriel Rossetti: W. Small: Frederick Sandys: J. Mcneill Whistler: Frederick Walker, A.R.A.: and Others
Dante Alighieri · en
ARTHUR HUGHES.--In 1855 appeared _The Music-master_, the second
enlarged and illustrated edition of _Day and Night Songs_, a book
of poems by William Allingham, to which reference has been made
several times in this chronicle. Of its ten illustrations, seven and
a vignette are from the hand of Arthur Hughes. The artist thus early
associated with the leaders of the pre-Raphaelite movement, and still
actively at work, was never, technically, a member of the Brotherhood.
In 1858, however, we find him one of the enthusiastic young artists
Rossetti had gathered round him with a view to the production of the
so-called frescoes in the Oxford Union. The oft-told tale of this noble
failure need not be repeated here. Those who were responsible for the
paintings in question appear more or less relieved to find that the
work has ceased to exist. True, the majority of picture-lovers who
have never seen them regard them, sentimentally, as the fine flower
of pre-Raphaelite art, which faded before it was fully open. Judging
from the restored fragments which remain, had they been permanent, they
would not have been more than interesting curiosities; examples of the
'prentice efforts' of men who afterwards shaped the course of British
art, not merely for their own generation, but, as we can see to-day,
for a much longer time. The great difficulties of the task these ardent
novices undertook so light-heartedly may or may not have checked
the practice of wall-painting in England, if, indeed, one can speak
of a check to a movement that never existed. To trace in detail the
course of Mr. Hughes's work, from this date to the present, would be a
pleasant and somewhat lengthy task. Yet, although greater men are less
fully dealt with, a running narrative showing where the illustrations
appeared will be more valuable than any attempt to estimate the
intrinsic value of the work, or explain its attractive quality. That
the work is singularly lovable, and has found staunch and ardent
admirers amid varying schools of artists, is unquestionable. Without
claiming that it equals the best work of the 'Brotherhood,' it has a
charm all its own. The sense of delight in lovely things is present
throughout, nor does its elegance often degenerate to mere prettiness.
The naïve expression of a child's ideal of lovely forms, with a
curiously well-sustained type of beauty, neither Greek nor Gothic, yet
having a touch of paganism in its mysticism, is always present in it.
With a peculiarly individual manner--so that the signature, which is
usually to be found in some unobtrusive corner, is needless,--a student
of illustration can 'spot' an Arthur Hughes at the most rapid glance as
surely as he could identify a Du Maurier.