English Illustration 'The Sixties': 1855-70: With Numerous Illustrations by Ford Madox Brown: A. Boyd Houghton: Arthur Hughes: Charles Keene: M. J. Lawless: Lord Leighton, P.R.A.: Sir J. E. Millais, P.R.A.: G. Du Maurier: J. W. North, R.A.: G. J. Pinwell: Dante Gabriel Rossetti: W. Small: Frederick Sandys: J. Mcneill Whistler: Frederick Walker, A.R.A.: and Others
Dante Alighieri · en
There are painters and draughtsmen of all periods, before whose work
you are well content to cease from criticism, and to enjoy simply, with
all their imperfections, the qualities that attract you. Passionate
intensity, the perfection of academic draughtsmanship, dramatic
composition as it is usually understood, may, or may not, be always
evident. Whether they are or not is in this case of entirely secondary
importance. Certain indefinable qualities, lovable and lasting, are
sure to be the most noticeable, whether you light on a print that has
escaped you hitherto, or turn up one that you have known since the
day it was published. Like caters for the like, and this love which
the work provokes from those to whom it appeals seems also its chief
characteristic. In the whole mass of pictorial art you can hardly
find its equal in this particular respect. The care and sorrow of
life, its disillusions and injustice, are not so much forgotten, or
set aside thoughtlessly, as recognised at their relative unimportance
when contrasted with the widespread, yet absolutely indefinable thing,
which it is convenient to term Love. Not, be it explained, Love in its
carnal sense, but, in an abstract spiritual way, which seeks the quiet
happiness in adding to the joy of others, and trusts that somehow,
somewhere, good is the final end of ill.
It may be that this attempt to explain the impression of Mr. Hughes's
work is a purely personal one, but it is one that intimate study for
many years strengthens and raises to the unassailable position of a
positive fact. At the risk of appearing mawkishly sentimental, even
with the greater risk of reflecting sentimentality upon artistic work
which it has not, this impression of Mr. Arthur Hughes's art must be
set down unmistakably. Looking upon it from a purely technical aspect,
you might find much to praise, and perhaps a little to criticise; but,
taking it as an art addressed often enough to the purpose of forming
artistic ideals in the minds of the young, you cannot but regret that
the boys and girls of to-day, despite the army of artists of all ranks
catering for them, cannot know the peculiar delight that the children
of the sixties and early seventies enjoyed.