The Divine Comedy, Volume 3, Paradise — Dante Alighieri — John Shaqi
The Divine Comedy, Volume 3, Paradise
Dante Alighieri · en
[5] Constance, daughter of the king of Sicily, Roger 1.; married, in
1186, to the Emperor, Henry VI., the son of Frederick Barbarossa, and
father of Frederick II, who died in 1250, the last Emperor of his line.
Thus she spoke to me, and then began singing “Ave Maria,” and Singing
vanished, like a heavy thing through deep water. My sight, that
followed her so far as was possible, after it lost her turned to the
mark of greater desire, and wholly rendered itself to Beatrice; but she
so flashed upon my gaze that at first the sight endured it not: and
this made me more slow in questioning.
CANTO IV.
Doubts of Dante, respecting the justice of Heaven and the abode of the
blessed, solved by Beatrice.—Question of Dante as to the possibility of
reparation for broken vows.
Between two viands, distant and attractive in like measure, a free man
would die of hunger, before he would bring one of them to his teeth.
Thus a lamb would stand between two ravenings of fierce wolves, fearing
equally; thus would stand a dog between two does. Hence if, urged by my
doubts in like measure, I was silent, I blame not myself; nor, since it
was necessary, do I commend.
I was silent, but my desire was depicted on my face, and the
questioning with that far more fervent than by distinct speech.
Beatrice did what Daniel did, delivering Nebuchadnezzar from anger,
which had made him unjustly cruel, and said, “I see clearly how one and
the other desire draws thee, so that thy care so binds itself that it
breathes not forth. Thou reasonest, 'If the good will endure, by what
reckoning doth the violence of others lessen for me the measure of
desert?' Further, it gives thee occasion for doubt, that the souls
appear to return to the stars, in accordance with the opinion of
Plato.[1] These are the questions that thrust equally upon thy wish;
and therefore I will treat first of that which hath the most venom.[2]
[1] Plato, in his Timaeus (41, 42), says that the creator of the
universe assigned each soul to a star, whence they were to be sown in
the vessels of time. “ He who lived well during his appointed time was
to return to the star which was his habitation, and there he would have
a blessed and suitable existence.” Dante's doubt has arisen from the
words of Piccarda, which implied that her station was in the sphere of
the Moon.
[2] The conception that the souls after death had their abode in the
stars would be a definite heresy, and hence far more dangerous than a
question concerning the justice of Heaven, for such a question might be
consistent with entire faith in that justice.