Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 1 (of 3)
Georg Hegel · en
We have still to consider the relationship of the universal as opposed
to Being, or consciousness as such in its relation to what is. By
Anaxagoras’ determination of real existence, this relationship of
consciousness is also determined. In this regard nothing satisfactory
can be found; for he recognized, on the one hand, thought as real
existence, without, however, bringing this thought to bear on ordinary
reality. Thus, on the other hand, this is destitute of thought and
independent, an infinite number of homœomeriæ, _i.e._ an infinite
amount of a sensuous implicit existence, which now, however, is
sensuous Being; for existent Being is an accumulation of homœomeriæ.
The relationship borne by consciousness to real existence may likewise
be various. Anaxagoras could thus either say that the truth is only in
thought and in rational knowledge, or that it is sensuous perception;
for in this we have the homœomeriæ which are themselves implicit. Thus,
in the first place, we find from him—as Sextus tells us, (adv. Math.
VII., 89-91) “that the understanding (_λόγος_) is the criterion of
the truth; the senses cannot judge of the truth on account of their
weakness”—weakness for the homœomeriæ are the infinitely small;
the senses could not grasp them, do not know that they have to be
something ideal and thought. A celebrated example of this is given by
him according to Sextus (Pyrrh. Hyp. I. 13, §. 33), in the assertion
that “the snow is black, for it is water, and water is black.” He
here asserts the truth in a reason. In the second place, according to
Aristotle (Met. III. 7), Anaxagoras is said to have asserted that,
“there is a medium between contradiction (_ἀντιφάσεως_); so that
everything is untrue. For because the two sides of the opposition are
mingled, what is mingled is neither good nor not good, and thus not
true.” Aristotle also quotes another time from him (Met. III. 5): “That
one of his apothegms to his disciples was that to them things were as
they supposed them.” This may relate to the fact that because existent
Being is an accumulation of homœomeriæ which are what really exists,
sensuous perception takes things as they are in truth.