The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
(_αα_) The relations of ethical life, the aggregate of the family, of
the people regarded as a complete nation, not merely with a view to
war, but also in their peaceful security, must have become a positive
fact in their evolution; yet along with this their organization cannot
as yet have assumed the settled form of co-ordinate regulations,
obligations, and laws independent in their validity of the direct
personal and private activities of individuals, and possessive of the
power to maintain themselves against such particular wills. Rather it
is the _intuitive sense_ of right and fairness, the moral habit, the
temperament, the personality, which supply the support, as they are
the source, of such a social order; we have, in short, no theoretic
intelligence in its precipitated form of prosaic reality able to
establish and secure such a resistance to the heart, the opinions and
passions of individuals. We may dismiss the thought that a community
with a fully organized constitution and an elaborate system of law,
judicial courts, government officials and police, would supply the
environment of a really epic action.[3] The conditions of positive
morality must, no doubt, be present in the general will and conduct,
but the instruments of its realization can only be the action and
personality of individuals, and a determinate mode of its existence, of
universal application and independent stability, is necessarily absent.
We find, in short, in the Epos no doubt the substantive reciprocity
of objective life and action, but we find no less a freedom in this
world of life and action, which has all the appearance of originating
exclusively from the isolated volition of individuals.
(_ββ_) The same considerations apply to the relation of the individual
to the _natural_ environment, from which he borrows the means to
_satisfy_ his wants, no less than discovers the best way to do so.
In this respect, too, I would refer the reader back to what I have
observed at greater length, when discussing the external definition of
the Ideal.