The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
We may explain in a similar way Homer's great variety in his
descriptions of Nature and external condition. In the prose romances of
our own day we do not find much stress laid on the natural aspects of
things. Homer, on the contrary, gives us every detail in his portrayal
of a staff, sceptre, bedstead, armour, clothing, doorpost; he does
not even omit to mention the hinges on which the door turns. Such
things appear to us wholly outside our attention and insignificant; or
rather we may say that it is the tendency of our education to affect
an extremely severe superiority to a whole number of objects, matters,
and expressions, and we deliberately classify in their claim to our
notice such things as various kinds of dress, furniture, implements,
and so on. Add to this the fact that in our day all the means supplied
or prepared for the satisfaction of our wants are so split up into
every kind of machinery product from work-shop and factory, we come
to regard the medley of supply as something beneath us, neither
deserving enumeration or respectful attention. The heroic existence
is, on the contrary, confronted with a primitive simplicity of objects
and inventions; it readily lingers on their description. All these
possessions are, in short, regarded as of one standard of value, as
chattels or instruments in which man still discovers evidence of his
craftsmanship, his positive wealth and interest whereof he may be
justly proud. His entire life is not abstracted from such material
things, nor exclusively occupied with a purely intellectual sphere.
To slaughter oxen and prepare their flesh for the table, to pour out
wine and things of that sort are part of the heroic life, carried out
with purpose and delight; with us a meal, if it is not to be a very
commonplace affair, must not merely carry with it something of the
culinary art, but is incomplete without really good conversation.
Homer's detailed descriptions in these matters must not therefore be
looked upon as a purely poetical embellishment of things of little
moment; such a copious attention is nothing more or less than the
actual spirit of the men and circumstances depicted. We find just the
same prolixity of speech on external things in the case of our own
peasants; and for that matter do not the dandies of our own day dilate
without limit upon their stables, horses, top-boots, spurs, pants, and
the like. In contrast to a life of profounder intellectual interest
such things will doubtless appear somewhat jejune.