The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
Such a world ought not merely to embrace the _limited_ universality
of the particular event, which occurs on the _definite_ background
presupposed; it must coalesce in its expansion with the _entire
horizon_ of the national vision. We have a supremely fine example of
this in the Odyssey, which not only brings us into contact with the
domestic life of the Greek chieftains, their servants and subordinates,
but also unfolds the richest variety with its tales of the many
opinions of foreign peoples, the hazards of sea-life, the dwellings
of distant lands, and so forth. But in the Iliad also, though the
nature of its subject restricts to some extent the horizon of our
vision, and not unnaturally on its battle-fields has comparatively
little to tell us of more tranquil scenes, Homer, at least, has on the
shield of Achilles managed in a wonderful way to give us a view of
the entire compass of terrestrial existence, no less than human life,
in marriages, judicial affairs, agriculture, the might of armies, the
private wars of cities, and much else. And these descriptions we 'shall
do well not to regard as a wholly incidental feature of the poem. In
contrast to such a treatment the poems we identify with the name of
Ossian introduce us to a world that is too limited and indefinite. It
has for this very reason rather a lyrical character; and as for Dante
we may say that his angels and devils inhabit no truly positive world
open to our detailed approach; it exists solely as instrumental to
the final fruition or due punishment of mankind. And above all in the
Nibelungenlied the absence is complete of any definite realization of
a visible world or environment, so that the narrative tends in this
respect to assume the strain or tone of the mere balladsinger. The
narrative is, no doubt, diffusive enough; but it is all much as if
some journeyman had picked it up first as gossip, and then retailed
it as such afterwards. We are not brought to close quarters with the
facts, but are merely made aware of the impotence and tedious effort
of the poet. This wearisome expanse of poetical debility becomes of
course even more pronounced in the Book of Heroes, until finally the
whole business is handed over to the true poetical journeyman, in other
words, the Master singers.
(_β_) Furthermore, for the reason that the Epos has to embody in art a
specific world, in all its separate characteristics carefully defined,
one, in short, for this reason itself essentially individual, the
mirror of such a world must be that of a one _particular_ people.