The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
(_αα_) In this respect all truly primitive Epopees present to our view
a national spirit in the ethical structure of its family life, its
public dispositions in times of peace or war, its wants, arts, usages,
and interests--in a word, a picture of the relative type and stage
of the national consciousness. What the epic poem reveres more than
anything else, observes most narrowly, that which, as previously
noted, it expatiates upon, is the power to let our inward eye see as
in a mirror the individual genius of nations. We have presented us,
as the result of such a gallery, the world-history itself, and what
is more, we have it in its beautiful, free, and emphasized vitality,
manifestation, and deed. From no source, either so impregnate with life
or simplicity, can we, for example, better understand the Hellenic
spirit and Greek history, or at least grasp the principle of that
content, which this people embodied, and which it brought with it when
it first set forth to engage in the conflict of its wholly authentic
history, than from this of the poet Homer.
(_ββ_) Now the national substance in its realization is of a _twofold_
nature. First, we have an entirely _positive_ world of specialized
usage or custom peculiar to the nation in question, a definite period
of history, a definite environment, whether geographical in its
streams, hills and forests, or in its climatic situation. Secondly,
we have that ideal _substance_ of its spiritual life, whether in
the religious sphere, the family or the community generally. If
thus an Epos of the primitive type is, under the conditions already
indicated, to be and remain a permanently effective bible, the
nation's Book, in that case that which is positive in the reality
of the Past can only claim such a continuously vital interest in so
far as the characteristic features accepted are placed in an ideal
connection with the actually substantive aspects and tendencies of the
national life. Otherwise what claims to be of positive value will be
entirely contingent and a matter of indifference. Native geographical
conditions, for instance, enter into the conception of nationality. But
if they do not confer on a folk its specific character, the addition of
other natural environment, provided that does not contradict national
character, is not in certain cases prejudicial to the effect, but may
even prove attractive to the imagination. No doubt the sensitive
experience of youth is interwoven with the immediate presence of its
native hills and streams; but where the deeper bonds of the entire
spiritual outlook are absent, such an association assumes a more or
less external character. And, apart from this, where we have, as in
the Iliad, a warlike expedition, it is impossible to preserve the
_locale_ of the fatherland. In such a case the scenery of a foreign
land in itself fascinates and attracts. The enduring vitality of an
Epos is, however, more seriously impaired, where, in the course of