The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik — Georg Hegel — John Shaqi
The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
(_α_) In contrast to such a definite view, which is based upon the
essential character of dramatic poetry itself, it is a feature of
modern notions on the subject, particularly so among ourselves,
to regard the organization of drama with a view to its theatrical
reproduction as unessential and subsidiary, although as a fact all
dramatic authors, even when they adopt this attitude of indifference
and contempt, entertain the wish and hope to see their compositions
on the stage. The result is that the greater number of more recent
dramas are unable ever to find a stage, and the simple reason of this
is that they are undramatical. We are not of course, therefore, in a
position to deny that a dramatic composition may satisfy the conditions
of genuine poetry in virtue of its intrinsic worth. What we affirm is
that it is only to an action, the dramatic course of which is admirably
adapted to theatrical representation, that we are to attribute such
intrinsic dramatic worth. The best authority for such a statement is
supplied by the Greek tragedies. It is true that we no longer see these
on the contemporary stage, but they do nevertheless, if we regard the
facts more closely, completely satisfy us to a real extent precisely on
this ground that they were written without reserve for the theatre of
their day. What has banished them from the theatre of today is not so
much the character of their dramatic organization, which differs mainly
from that of to-day in its employment of the chorus, as in the nature
of national predilections and conditions, upon which for the most part,
if we consider their content, they are based, and in which owing to the
distance in which they are placed relatively to our own contemporary
life we are unable now to feel ourselves at home. The malady of
Philoctetes, for instance, the loathsome ulcer on his foot, his
ejaculations and outcries, are as little likely to awaken the genuine
interest of a modern audience as the arrows of Hercules, about which
the main course of that drama revolves. In a similar way, though we may
admit the barbaric cruelty of the human sacrifice in the Iphigeneia
in Aulis and Tauris in an opera, we find it absolutely necessary in
tragedy at any rate that this aspect should be wholly revised as Goethe
has in fact done.