The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
The interests among which this type of comedy moves are not necessarily
taken from the opposed spheres of religion, morality, and art. On the
contrary the old Greek comedy remains no doubt within the limits of
this positive and substantive content of human life; but it is the
individual caprice, the vulgar folly and perversity, by reason of
which the characters concerned bring to nought activities which in
their aim have a finer significance. And in this respect an ample and
very pertinent material is supplied Aristophanes partly by Greek gods,
and partly by the life of the Athenian people. In other words, the
configuration of the divine in human impersonation itself possesses, in
its mode of presentation and its particularization, to the extent at
least that it is further enforced in opposition to that which is merely
one-sided and human, the contradiction that is opposed to the nobility
of its significance; it is thus permitted to appear as a purely empty
extension of this personal life which is inadequate wholly to express
it. More particularly, however, Aristophanes revels in the follies of
the common folk, the stupidities of its orators and statesmen, the
blockheadedness of war, and is eager, above all, and with all the
politeness of his satire and the full weight of his ridicule, but also
not without the profoundest meaning, to hand over the new tendencies
of the tragedies of Euripides to the laughter of his fellow-citizens.
The characters he has imported into the substance of his amazing
artistic creations he runs into the mould of fool from the start with
a sportive fancy that seems inexhaustible, so that the very idea of a
rational result is impossible. He treats all alike, whether it be a
Strepsiades, who will join the ranks of philosophers in order to be
rid of his debts, or a Socrates, who offers to instruct the aforesaid
Strepsiades and his son, or Bacchus, whom he makes descend into the
lower world, in order to bring up a genuine tragic poet, and in just
the same way Cleon, the women and the Greeks, who would like to pump
up the goddess of Peace from the well. The key-note that we find in
all these various creations is the imperturbable self-assurance of
such characters one and all, which becomes all the more emphatic in
proportion as they prove themselves incapable of carrying into effect
that which they project. Our fools here are so entirely unembarrassed
in their folly, and also the more sensible among them possess such a
tincture of that which runs contrary to the very course upon which they
are set, that they all, the more sensible with the rest, remain fixed
to this personal attitude of prodigious imperturbility, no matter what
comes next or where it carries them. It is in fact the blessed laughter
of the Olympian gods, with their untroubled equanimity, now at home
in the human breast, and prepared for all contingences. And withal we
never find Aristophanes merely a cold or evil-disposed mocker. He was a