The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
man of the finest education, a most exemplary citizen, to whom the weal
of Athens was of really deep importance, and who through thick and thin
shows himself to be a true patriot. What therefore is in the fullest
sense resolved in his comedies is, as already stated, not the divine
and what is of ethical import, but the thoroughgoing upside-down-ness
which inflates itself into the semblance of these substantive forces,
the particular form and distinctive mode of its manifestation, in which
the essential thing or matter is already from the first no longer
present, so that it can without restriction be simply handed over to
the unconcerned play of unqualified personal caprice. But for the very
reason that Aristophanes makes explicit the absolute contradiction
between the essential nature of the gods, or that of political and
social life, and the personal activities of individual persons or
citizens, who ought to endow such substantive form with reality, we
find in this very triumph of purely personal self-assertion, despite
all the profounder insight which the poet displays, one of the greatest
symptoms of the degeneracy of Greece. And it is on account of this that
these pictures of a wholly unperturbed sense of "everything coming
out right in the end" [54] are as a matter of fact the last important
harvest which we have from the poetry created by the exuberant genius,
culture, and wit of the Greek nation.
(_β_) I shall now direct attention to the dramatic art of the modern
world, and here, too, I only propose to emphasize the more general and
fundamental features which we find of importance, whether dealing with
tragedy or the ordinary drama and comedy.
(_αα_) Tragedy, in the nobility which distinguishes it in its ancient
plastic form, is limited to the partial point of view that for its
exclusive and essential basis it only enforces as effective the
ethically substantive content and its necessary laws; and, on the other
hand, leaves the individual and subjective self-penetration of the
dramatic characters essentially unevolved; while comedy on its part,
to complete what we may regard as the reversed side of such plastic
construction, exhibits to us the personal caprice of soul-life in the
unfettered abandonment of its topsy-turvydom and ultimate dissolution.
_Modern tragedy_ accepts in its own province from the first the
principle of subjectivity or self-assertion. It makes, therefore, the
personal intimacy of character--the character, that is, which is no
purely individual and vital embodiment of ethical forces in the classic
sense--its peculiar object and content. It, moreover, makes, in a type
of concurrence that is adapted to this end, human actions come into
collision through the instrumentality of the external accident of
circumstances in the way that a contingency of a similar character is
also decisive in its effect on the consequence, or appears to be so
decisive.