The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
13. There are also other quantities which are determinable from the
knowledge of their causes, namely, from the comparison of the motions by
which they are made; and that more easily than from the common elements
of geometry. For example, that the superficies of any portion of a
sphere is equal to that circle, whose radius is a strait line drawn from
the pole of the portion to the circumference of its base, I may
demonstrate in this manner. Let B A C (in fig. 7) be a portion of a
sphere, whose axis is A E, and whose base is B C; and let A B be the
strait line drawn from the pole A to the base in B; and let A D, equal
to A B, touch the great circle B A C in the pole A. It is to be proved
that the circle made by the radius A D is equal to the superficies of
the portion B A C. Let the plain A E B D be understood to make a
revolution about the axis A E; and it is manifest that by the strait
line A D a circle will be described; and by the arch A B the superficies
of a portion of a sphere; and lastly, by the subtense A B the
superficies of a right cone. Now seeing both the strait line A B and the
arch A B make one and the same revolution, and both of them have the
same extreme points A and B, the cause why the spherical superficies,
which is made by the arch, is greater than the conical superficies,
which is made by the subtense, is, that A B the arch is greater than A B
the subtense; and the cause why it is greater consists in this, that
although they be both drawn from A to B, yet the subtense is drawn
strait, but the arch angularly, namely, according to that angle which
the arch makes with the subtense, which angle is equal to the angle D A
B (for an angle of contingence adds nothing to an angle of a segment, as
has been shown in chapter XIV, article 16.) Wherefore the magnitude of
the angle D A B is the cause why the superficies of the portion,
described by the arch A B, is greater than the superficies of the right
cone described by the subtense A B.
Again, the cause why the circle described by the tangent A D is greater
than the superficies of the right cone described by the subtense A B
(notwithstanding that the tangent and the subtense are equal, and both
moved round in the same time) is this, that A D stands at right angles
to the axis, but A B obliquely; which obliquity consists in the same
angle D A B. Seeing therefore the quantity of the angle D A B is that
which makes the excess both of the superficies of the portion, and of
the circle made by the radius A D, above the superficies of the right
cone described by the subtense A B; it follows, that both the
superficies of the portion and that of the circle do equally exceed the
superficies of the cone. Wherefore the circle made by A D or A B, and
the spherical superficies made by the arch A B, are equal to one
another; which was to be proved.