The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
1. Men are subject to _err_ not only in affirming and denying, but also
in perception, and in silent cogitation. In affirming and denying, when
they call any thing by a name, which is not the name thereof; as if from
seeing the sun first by reflection in water, and afterwards again
directly in the firmament, we should to both those appearances give the
name of sun, and say there are two suns; which none but men can do, for
no other living creatures have the use of names. This kind of error only
deserves the name of _falsity_, as arising, not from sense, nor from the
things themselves, but from pronouncing rashly; for names have their
constitution, not from the species of things, but from the will and
consent of men. And hence it comes to pass, that men pronounce
_falsely_, by their own negligence, in departing from such appellations
of things as are agreed upon, and are not deceived neither by the
things, nor by the sense; for they do not perceive that the thing they
see is called sun, but they give it that name from their own will and
agreement. Tacit errors, or the errors of sense and cogitation, are
made, by passing from one imagination to the imagination of another
different thing; or by feigning that to be past, or future, which never
was, nor ever shall be; as when, by seeing the image of the sun in
water, we imagine the sun itself to be there; or by seeing swords, that
there has been or shall be fighting, because it uses to be so for the
most part; or when from promises we feign the mind of the promiser to be
such and such; or lastly, when from any sign we vainly imagine something
to be signified, which is not. And errors of this sort are common to all
things that have sense; and yet the deception proceeds neither from our
senses, nor from the things we perceive; but from ourselves while we
feign such things as are but mere images to be something more than
images. But neither things, nor imaginations of things, can be said to
be false, seeing they are truly what they are; nor do they, as signs,
promise any thing which they do not perform; for they indeed do not
promise at all, but we from them; nor do the clouds, but we, from seeing
the clouds, say it shall rain. The best way, therefore, to free
ourselves from such errors as arise from natural signs, is first of all,
before we begin to reason concerning such conjectural things, to suppose
ourselves ignorant, and then to make use of our ratiocination; for these
errors proceed from the want of ratiocination; whereas, errors which
consist in affirmation and negation, (that is, the falsity of
propositions) proceed only from reasoning amiss. Of these, therefore, as
repugnant to philosophy, I will speak principally.
[Sidenote: A sevenfold incoherency of names, all of which make always a
false proposition.]