The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 02 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
2. Aristotle, in his seventh book and fourteenth chapter of his
_Politics_, saith, that there are two sorts of governments;
whereof the one relates to the benefit of the _ruler_, the other
to that of the _subjects_. As if where _subjects_ are severely
dealt with, there were one, and where more mildly, there were
another form of government. Which opinion may by no means be
subscribed to; for all the profits and disprofits arising from
government are the same, and common both to the _ruler_ and the
_subject_. The damages which befall some particular subjects
through misfortune, folly, negligence, sloth, or his own luxury,
may very well be severed from those which concern the ruler. But
those relate not to the government itself, being such as may
happen in any form of government whatsoever. If these same happen
from the first institution of the city, they will then be truly
called the inconveniences of government; but they will be common
to the ruler with his subjects, as their benefits are common. But
the first and greatest benefit, peace and defence, is to both; for
both he that commands, and he who is commanded, to the end that he
may defend his life makes use at once of all the forces of his
fellow-subjects. And in the greatest inconvenience that can befall
a city, namely, the slaughter of subjects arising from anarchy,
both the commander and the parties commanded are equally
concerned. Next, if the ruler levy such a sum of vast moneys from
his subjects, as they are not able to maintain themselves and
their families, nor conserve their bodily strength and vigor, the
disadvantage is as much his as theirs, who, with never so great a
stock or measure of riches, is not able to keep his authority or
his riches without the bodies of his subjects. But if he raise no
more than is sufficient for the due administration of his power,
that is a benefit equally to himself and his subjects, tending to
a common peace and defence. Nor is it imaginable which way
_public_ treasures can be a grievance to _private_ subjects, if
they be not so exhausted as to be wholly deprived from all
possibility to acquire, even by their industry, necessaries to
sustain the strength of their bodies and minds. For even thus the
grievance would concern the ruler; nor would it arise from the
ill-institution or ordination of the government, because in all
manner of governments subjects may be oppressed; but from the
ill-administration of a well-established government.
[Sidenote: The praise of monarchy.]