The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 02 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
1. We have already in the foregoing chapters, proved both by reason
and testimonies of holy writ, that the estate of nature, that is to
say, of absolute liberty, such as is theirs who neither govern nor
are governed, is an anarchy or hostile state; that the precepts
whereby to avoid this state, are _the laws of nature_; that there
can be no civil government without a sovereign; and that they who
have gotten this sovereign command, must be obeyed simply, that is
to say, in all things which repugn not the commandments of God.
There is this one thing only wanting to the complete understanding
of all civil duty, and that is, to know which are the laws and
commandments of God. For else we cannot tell whether that which the
civil power commands us, be against the laws of God, or not; whence
it must necessarily happen, that either by too much obedience to the
civil authority we become stubborn against the divine Majesty; or
for fear of sinning against God we run into disobedience against the
civil power. To avoid both these rocks, it is necessary to know the
divine laws. Now because the knowledge of the laws depends on the
knowledge of the kingdom, we must in what follows speak somewhat
concerning the _kingdom of God_.
[Sidenote: Over whom God is said to reign:]
2. _The Lord is king, the earth may be glad thereof_; saith the
psalmist, (Psalm xcvii. 1). And again the same psalmist, (Psalm
xcix. 1): _The Lord is king, be the people never so impatient; he
sitteth between the cherubims, be the earth never so unquiet_; to
wit, whether men will or not, God is the king over all the earth;
nor is he moved from his throne, if there be any who deny either his
_existence_ or his _providence_. Now although God govern all men so
by his power, that none can do anything which he would not have
done: yet this, to speak properly and accurately, is not to reign.
For he is said to reign, who rules not by _acting_, but _speaking_,
that is to say, by _precepts_ and _threatenings_. And therefore we
count not inanimate nor irrational bodies for subjects in the
kingdom of God, although they be subordinate to the divine power;
because they _understand not the commands and threats_ of God: nor
yet the atheists, because they believe not that there is a God; nor
yet those who believing there is a God, do not yet believe that he
rules these inferior things: for even these, although they be
governed by the power of God, yet do they not acknowledge any of his
_commands_, nor stand in awe of his _threats_. Those only therefore
are supposed to belong to God’s kingdom, who acknowledge him to be
the governor of all things, and that he hath given _his commands_ to
men, and appointed _punishments_ for the transgressors. The rest we
must not call subjects, but enemies of God.
[Sidenote: The word of God threefold; reason, revelation, prophesy.]