The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 03 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
The power of _remission and retention of sins_, called also the power of
_loosing_ and _binding_, and sometimes the _keys of the kingdom of
heaven_, is a consequence of the authority to baptize, or refuse to
baptize. For baptism is the sacrament of allegiance of them that are to
be received into the kingdom of God; that is to say, into eternal life;
that is to say, to remission of sin: for as eternal life was lost by the
committing, so it is recovered by the remitting of men’s sins. The end
of baptism is remission of sins: and therefore St. Peter, when they that
were converted by his sermon on the day of Pentecost, asked what they
were to do, advised them (_Acts_ ii. 38) to _repent, and be baptized in
the name of Jesus, for the remission of sins_. And therefore, seeing to
baptize is to declare the reception of men into God’s kingdom; and to
refuse to baptize is to declare their exclusion; it followeth, that the
power to declare them cast out, or retained in it, was given to the same
apostles, and their substitutes and successors. And therefore after our
Saviour had breathed upon them, saying (_John_ xx. 22) _Receive the Holy
Ghost_, he addeth in the next verse, _Whosesoever sins ye remit, they
are remitted unto them; and whosesoever sins ye retain, they are
retained_. By which words, is not granted an authority to forgive or
retain sins, simply and absolutely, as God forgiveth or retaineth them,
who knoweth the heart of man, and truth of his penitence and conversion;
but conditionally, to the penitent: and this forgiveness, or absolution,
in case the absolved have but a feigned repentance, is thereby, without
other act, or sentence of the absolved, made void, and hath no effect at
all to salvation, but on the contrary to the aggravation of his sin.
Therefore the apostles, and their successors, are to follow but the
outward marks of repentance; which appearing, they have no authority to
deny absolution; and if they appear not, they have no authority to
absolve. The same also is to be observed in baptism: for to a converted
Jew, or Gentile, the apostles had not the power to deny baptism; nor to
grant it to the unpenitent. But seeing no man is able to discern the
truth of another man’s repentance, further than by external marks, taken
from his words and actions, which are subject to hypocrisy; another
question will arise, who it is that is constituted judge of those marks?
And this question is decided by our Saviour himself; _If thy brother_,
saith he, (_Matth._ xviii. 15, 16, 17) _shall trespass against thee, go
and tell him his fault, between thee and him alone; if he shall hear
thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then
take with thee one or two more. And if he shall neglect to hear them,
tell it unto the Church; but if he neglect to hear the Church, let him
be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican._ By which it is manifest,
that the judgment concerning the truth of repentance, belonged not to