The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 03 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 03 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
The fool hath said in his heart, there is no such thing as justice; and
sometimes also with his tongue; seriously alleging, that every man’s
conservation, and contentment, being committed to his own care, there
could be no reason, why every man might not do what he thought conduced
thereunto: and therefore also to make, or not make; keep, or not keep
covenants, was not against reason, when it conduced to one’s benefit. He
does not therein deny, that there be covenants; and that they are
sometimes broken, sometimes kept; and that such breach of them may be
called injustice, and the observance of them justice: but he
questioneth, whether injustice, taking away the fear of God, for the
same fool hath said in his heart there is no God, may not sometimes
stand with that reason, which dictateth to every man his own good; and
particularly then, when it conduceth to such a benefit, as shall put a
man in a condition, to neglect not only the dispraise, and revilings,
but also the power of other men. The kingdom of God is gotten by
violence: but what if it could be gotten by unjust violence? were it
against reason so to get it, when it is impossible to receive hurt by
it? and if it be not against reason, it is not against justice; or else
justice is not to be approved for good. From such reasoning as this,
successful wickedness hath obtained the name of virtue: and some that in
all other things have disallowed the violation of faith; yet have
allowed it, when it is for the getting of a kingdom. And the heathen
that believed, that Saturn was deposed by his son Jupiter, believed
nevertheless the same Jupiter to be the avenger of injustice: somewhat
like to a piece of law in Coke’s _Commentaries on Littleton_; where he
says, if the right heir of the crown be attainted of treason; yet the
crown shall descend to him, and _eo instante_ the attainder be void:
from which instances a man will be very prone to infer; that when the
heir apparent of a kingdom, shall kill him that is in possession, though
his father; you may call it injustice, or by what other name you will;
yet it can never be against reason, seeing all the voluntary actions of
men tend to the benefit of themselves; and those actions are most
reasonable, that conduce most to their ends. This specious reasoning is
nevertheless false.