The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
deliberations and affections are in part the causes of our contrary
resolutions, and do concur with the outward causes to make up one total
and adequate cause to the necessary production of this effect. If it be
so, he hath spun a fair thread, to make all this stir for such a
necessity as no man ever denied or doubted of. When all the causes have
actually determined themselves, then the effect is in being; for though
there be a priority in nature between the cause and the effect, yet they
are together in time. And the old rule is, (_e_) ‘whatsoever is, when it
is, is necessarily so as it is.’ This is no absolute necessity, but only
upon supposition, that a man hath determined his own liberty. When we
question whether all occurrences be necessary, we do not question
whether they be necessary when they are, nor whether they be necessary
_in sensu composito_, after we have resolved and finally determined what
to do; but whether they were necessary before they were determined by
ourselves, by or in the precedent causes before ourselves, or in the
exterior causes without ourselves. It is not inconsistent with true
liberty to determine itself, but it is inconsistent with true liberty to
be determined by another without itself.
“T. H. saith further ‘that upon your Lordship’s desire and mine, he was
contented to begin with this discourse of Liberty and Necessity,’ that
is, to change his former resolution. (_f_) If the chain of necessity be
no stronger, but that it may be snapped so easily insunder; if his will
was no otherwise determined without himself, but only by the
signification of your Lordship’s desire and my modest entreaty, then we
may easily conclude that human affairs are not always governed by
absolute necessity; that a man is lord of his own actions, if not in
chief, yet in mean, subordinate to the Lord paramount of heaven and
earth; and that all things are not so absolutely determined in the
outward and precedent causes, but that fair entreaties and moral
persuasions may work upon a good nature so far, as to prevent that which
otherwise had been, and to produce that which otherwise had not been. He
that can reconcile this with an antecedent necessity of all things, and
a physical or natural determination of all causes, shall be great Apollo
to me.
“Whereas T. H. saith that he had never uttered his opinion of this
question, I suppose he intends in writing; my conversation with him hath
not been frequent, yet I remember well that when this question was
agitated between us two in your Lordship’s chamber by your command, he
did then declare himself in words, both for the absolute necessity of
all events, and for the ground of this necessity, the flux or
concatenation of the second causes.”
ANIMADVERSIONS UPON THE BISHOP’S REPLY NO. I.
(_a_) “The first day that I did read over T. H.’s defence of necessity,”
&c.