The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_T. H._ Secondly, I conceive when a man deliberates whether he shall do
a thing or not do a thing, that he does nothing else but consider
whether it be better for himself to do it or not to do it. And to
consider an action, is to imagine the consequences of it, both good and
evil. From whence is to be inferred, that deliberation is nothing but
alternate imagination of the good and evil sequels of an action, or
(which is the same thing) alternate hope and fear, or alternate appetite
to do or acquit the action of which he deliberateth.
[Sidenote: The Bishop’s reply.]
_J. D._ (_a_) “If I did not know what deliberation was, I should be
little relieved in my knowledge by this description. Sometimes he makes
it to be a consideration, or an act of the understanding; sometimes an
imagination, or an act of the fancy; sometimes he makes it to be an
alternation of passions, hope and fear. Sometimes he makes it concern
the end, sometimes to concern the means. So he makes it I know not what.
The truth is this in brief: ‘Deliberation is an inquiry made by reason,
whether this or that, definitely considered, be a good and fit means,
or, indefinitely, what are good and fit means to be chosen for attaining
some wished end.’”
ANIMADVERSIONS UPON THE ANSWER TO NO. XXVI.
(_a_) “If I did not know what deliberation was, I should be little
relieved in my knowledge by this description. Sometimes he makes it to
be a consideration, or an act of the understanding, sometimes an
imagination, or an act of the fancy, &c. So he makes it I know not
what.” If the Bishop had observed what he does himself, when he
deliberates, reasons, understands, or imagines, he would have known what
to make of all that I have said in this Number. He would have known that
consideration, understanding, reason, and all the passions of the mind,
are imaginations. That to consider a thing, is to imagine it; that to
understand a thing, is to imagine it; that to hope and fear, are to
imagine the things hoped for and feared. The difference between them is,
that when we imagine the consequence of anything, we are said to
consider that thing; and when we have imagined anything from a sign, and
especially from those signs we call names, we are said to understand his
meaning that maketh the sign; and when we reason, we imagine the
consequence of affirmations and negations joined together; and when we
hope or fear, we imagine things good or hurtful to ourselves: insomuch
as all these are but imaginations diversely named from different
circumstances: as any man may perceive as easily as he can look into his
own thoughts. But to him that thinketh not himself upon the things
whereof, but upon the words wherewith he speaketh, and taketh those
words on trust from puzzled Schoolmen, it is not only hard, but
impossible to be known. And this is the reason that maketh him say, I
make deliberation he knows not what. But how is deliberation defined by