The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
The influence of the stars is but a small part of the whole cause,
consisting of the concourse of all agents.
Nor doth the concourse of all causes make one simple chain or
concatenation, but an innumerable number of chains joined together, not
in all parts, but in the first link, God Almighty; and consequently the
whole cause of an event does not always depend upon one single chain,
but on many together.
Natural efficacy of objects does determine voluntary agents, and
necessitates the will, and consequently the action; but for moral
efficacy, I understand not what he means by it. The last dictate of the
judgment concerning the good or bad that may follow on any action, is
not properly the whole cause, but the last part of it; and yet may be
said to produce the effect necessarily, in such manner as the last
feather may be said to break an horse’s back, when there were so many
laid on before as there wanted but that to do it.
Now for his argument, that if the concourse of all the causes
necessitate the effect, that then it follows, Adam had no true liberty.
I deny the consequence; for I make not only the effect, but also the
election of that particular effect to be necessary, inasmuch as the will
itself, and each propension of a man during his deliberation, is as much
necessitated, and depends on a sufficient cause, as any thing else
whatsoever. As for example, it is no more necessary that fire should
burn, than that a man, or other creature, whose limbs be moved by fancy,
should have election, that is, liberty to do what he has a fancy to,
though it be not in his will or power to choose his fancy, or choose his
election or will.
This doctrine, because he says he hates, I doubt had better been
suppressed; as it should have been, if both your Lordship and he had not
pressed me to an answer.
_J. D._ (_a_) “This argument was sent forth only as an espy to make a
more full discovery, what were the true grounds of T. H.’s supposed
necessity. Which errand being done, and the foundation whereupon he
builds being found out, which is, as I called it, a concatenation of
causes, and, as he calls it, a concourse of necessary causes; it would
now be a superfluous and impertinent work in me to undertake the
refutation of all those other opinions, which he doth not undertake to
defend. And therefore I shall waive them at the present, with these
short animadversions.