The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_Academics_, _Stoics_, _Peripatetics_, _&c._ were termed by the names of
so many several heresies. All men, you know, are subject to error, and
the ways of error very different; and therefore it is no wonder if these
wise and diligent searchers of the truth did, notwithstanding their
excellent parts, differ in many points amongst themselves. But this
laudable custom of great wealthy persons to have their children at any
price to learn philosophy, suggested to many idle and needy fellows an
easy and compendious way of maintenance; which was to teach the
philosophy, some of Plato, some of Aristotle, &c: whose books to that
end they read over, but without capacity or much endeavour to examine
the reasons of their doctrines, taking only the conclusions, as they
lay. And setting up with this, they soon professed themselves
philosophers, and got to be the school-masters to the youth of Greece.
But by competition for such employment, they hated and reviled one
another with all the bitter terms they could invent; and very often,
when upon occasion they were in civil company, fell first to
disputation, and then to blows, to the great trouble of the company and
their own shame. Yet amongst all their reproachful words, the name of
_heretic_ came never in, because they were all equally heretics, their
doctrine not being theirs, but taken upon trust from the aforesaid
authors. So that though we find heresy often mentioned in Lucian and
other heathen authors, yet we shall not find in any of them _hæreticus_
for a heretic. And this disorder among the philosophers continued a long
time in Greece, and infecting also the Romans, was at the greatest in
the times of the apostles and in the primitive Church, till the time of
the Nicene Council, and somewhat after. But at last the authority of the
Stoics and Epicureans was not much esteemed, only Plato’s and
Aristotle’s philosophy were much in credit; Plato’s with the better
sort, that founded their doctrine upon the conceptions and ideas of
things, and Aristotle’s with those that reasoned only from the names of
things, according to the scale of the _categories_. Nevertheless, there
were always, though not new sects of philosophy, yet new opinions
continually arising.
_L._ But how came the word heretic to be a reproach?