The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_P._ That granted, yet I see not how one man might accuse another any
the better for those Councils. For not one man of ten thousand had ever
read them, nor were they ever published in English, that a man might
avoid offending against them; nor perhaps are they extant. Nor if those
that we have printed in Latin, are the very acts of the Councils, which
is yet much disputed amongst divines, do I think it fit they were put in
the vulgar tongues. But it is not likely that the makers of the statutes
had any purpose to make heresy of whatsoever was repugnant to those four
general Councils. For if they had, I believe the Anabaptists, of which
there was great plenty in those times, would one time or other have been
questioned upon this article of the Nicene Creed, _I believe one baptism
for the remission of sins_. Nor was the commission itself for a long
time after registered, that men might in such uncertainty take heed and
abstain, for their better safety, from speaking of religion anything at
all. But by what law was this heretic Legat burnt? I grant he was an
Arian, and his heresy contrary to the determination of the Church of
England, in the highest points of Christianity. But seeing there was no
statute-law to burn him, and no penalty forbidding, by what law, by what
authority was he burnt?
_L._ That this Legat was accused of heresy, was no fault of the
high-commissioners; but when he was accused, it had been a fault in them
not to have examined him, or having examined him and found him an Arian,
not to have judged him so, or not to have certified him so. All this
they did, and this was all that belonged unto them; they meddled not
with his burning, but left him to the secular power to do with him what
they pleased.
_P._ Your justification of the commissioners is nothing to the question.
The question is by what law was he burnt? The spiritual-law gives no
sentence of temporal punishment; and Sir Edward Coke confesseth that he
could not be burned; and burning being forbidden by statute-law, by what
law then was he burned?
_L._ By the common-law.